but “intelligent design” creationism has absolutely no legitimacy as a scientific theory
There isn’t a single peer-reviewed paper that supports it
So what do you mean with "there isn't a single peer reviewd paper that suports it", when there are some around?
there are no reputable scientists who promote it
and the most famous (actually, the only) biologist identified with ID, Michael Behe
So in all the world, the only biologist who advocates an Inteligent Cause behind the design in the living world is Michael Behe? What about Jonathan Wells, who has degrees in Biology too? Perhaps he is not a "reputable biologist", right Charlie?
To end, here is another precious gem
This is why so many people believe the GOP has a problem with science — because it does.
The truth of the matter is that conservatives have no problems with science, but only with naturalism. Darwinist Rage Boy conflates the two as if those are one and the same.
0 comentários:
Post a Comment
Be respectful. Comments are moderated.