tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29279472984058723732024-03-13T14:36:47.486+00:00LeftismLucashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02515186017263921231noreply@blogger.comBlogger1161125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-11536319536534851382018-04-07T19:17:00.000+01:002018-04-07T19:17:00.465+01:00Marilyn Monroe and the Jews<div style="text-align: justify;">
Original title: <b><i>Marilyn Monroe, "I'll never have to suck another Jewish cock again!"</i></b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-EF5Rgfgi01M/WskIpfrHRFI/AAAAAAAABi4/9m77aMQ7gFsWalaYr2Kzyw-EIMci4MKfACLcBGAs/s1600/greenson.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="211" data-original-width="140" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-EF5Rgfgi01M/WskIpfrHRFI/AAAAAAAABi4/9m77aMQ7gFsWalaYr2Kzyw-EIMci4MKfACLcBGAs/s1600/greenson.jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Marilyn Monroe is one of many Gentile actors who fell under the dominance of a string of Jewish psychoanalysts, including, most famously, Ralph Greenson (born: Romeo Greenschpoon) who was her therapist when she allegedly committed suicide. "Like many of his colleagues at the time," notes a review of Donald Spoto's biography of Marilyn, "Greenson relied heavily on drug therapy for his patients, routinely prescribing barbiturates and tranquilizers or having patients' other doctors do so. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
He referred Marilyn to [Jewish] internist Hyman Engelberg, who prescribed many of the medications Greenson ordered for her ... Her friends noticed that the more Marilyn saw Greenson, the more miserable she became ... Greenson encouraged Marilyn's deep dependency on him (he was seeing her twice daily)" (Good Housekeeping, 1993, pp. 212, 214). [Image: Ralph Greenson.] </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The incestuous nature of Hollywood life may be observed in Greenson's case: his sister Elizabeth was married to Milton 'Mickey' Rudin, a Jewish entertainment attorney who was one of the town's major powerbrokers. Rudin was Monroe's lawyer.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Marilyn's publicist, Arthur Jacobs, was also Jewish. So were her agents at MCA, Jay Kanter and Mort Viner. Many of the directors of her films were Jews (for example, Billy Wilder of Some Like It Hot and George Cukor of Let's Make Love). Natasha Lytess, her personal manager and the subject of speculation about Monroe's rumored lesbianism, was Jewish, from Austria. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Their relationship, says Barbara Leaming, was "mutually exploitive" (Leaming, 31). Milton Greene, a Jewish fashion photographer "with whom she'd reportedly had a fling during the late forties," was another early personal manager. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Monroe had resolved to sleep with anyone who could help her attain fame and fortune in Jewish-dominated Hollywood. Close friend Ted Jordan notes that she had "sex with anybody she thought might be able to advance her career" (Jordan, 121). "It is clear," says Anthony Summers in his biography, "that Marilyn made judicious use of her favors. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A key beneficiary was the [Jewish] man who got Marilyn that vital first contract at Fox -- Ben Lyon. According to writer Sheila Graham, Lyon had been sleeping with Marilyn and promising to further her career ... Lyon called the casting director for Sol Wurtzel, a [Jewish] B-movie producer of the time [and Monroe was awarded a small part in the 1947 film Dangerous Years]" (Summers, 35).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-JrSlqeXVDME/WskJQJPk9qI/AAAAAAAABjA/L1DO9rf-gSY3BaLxI3qD2CWfuoxGQOFMQCLcBGAs/s1600/MM.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="619" data-original-width="516" height="200" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-JrSlqeXVDME/WskJQJPk9qI/AAAAAAAABjA/L1DO9rf-gSY3BaLxI3qD2CWfuoxGQOFMQCLcBGAs/s200/MM.jpg" width="166" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In olden times," Upton Sinclair once remarked, "Jewish traders sold Christian girls into concubinage and into prostitution, and even today they display the same activity in the same field in southern California where I live." Or as F. Scott Fitzgerald summed up the Hollywood scene of his era -- "a Jewish holiday, a Gentile tragedy" (Gabler, 2).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Garment millionaire Henry Rosenfeld was another Jewish sex partner on Marilyn's road to fame. "She would join Rosenfeld at his home in Atlantic City for trips in his speedboat and for quiet evenings of talk and laughter" (Summers, 45). Jewish mobster Bugsy Siegel, himself a Hollywood powerbroker, also slept with her (Jordan, 84, 87). Ted Jordan (born Edward Friedman) even wrote a book about his early sexual experiences with Monroe -- they began on his fourth date with her when she was 17. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Then known by her real name, Norma Jean, Monroe was soon sleeping with Friedman's uncle, Ted Lewis (original name also Friedman), who, "with his clarinet and distinctive style of old favorites, was among the hottest acts in show business" (Jordan, 73). It was Lewis who introduced the then-unknown model to narcotics.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
"I learned," says Jordan, "that at one point in their little backstage meeting, Ted had slipped Norma Jean a piece of paper with his telephone number on it. Soon they were meeting in hotel rooms whenever Ted was in town ... Soon he was pulling strings for Norma Jean, trying to hook her up with an agent who would do her the most good ... As Norma Jean had vowed to me, whoever she had to fuck, she was prepared to do it. And, for good measure, she did the same with [prominent Jewish gossip columnist] Walter Winchell" (Jordan, 75).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Early in Monroe's career as a struggling actress, the Jewish head of Columbia, Harry Cohn, invited her to an overnight cruise on his yacht. Monroe was required to strip naked for Cohn in his office. As she bent over, at his direction, he approached her, penis in hand. When she declined his advances, said Monroe, "I had never seen a man so angry" (Jordan, 91; Wolfe, 211-212). </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Cohn then "banned her from the [Columbia] lot after she refused to accompany him on a yacht to Catalina Island" (Leaming, 8). "You know," Monroe once said, "that when a producer calls an actress into his office to discuss a script that isn't all he has in mind ... I've slept with producers. I'd be a liar if I said I didn't" (Summers, 34-35). In 1955, 20th Century Fox awarded Monroe the richest per-film contract of any actress. "It means," remarked Monroe, "I'll never have to suck another cock again!" (McDougal, 217).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The network of Jewish men that controls Hollywood has always been characterized by an intense sexual fixation on the shiksa -- shiksa being a derogatory slur for a Gentile woman, literally signifying "unclean animal" according to its Yiddish etymology. Hence the ubiquitous "casting couch," a Hollywood institution that provided Jewish powerbrokers access to otherwise unavailable non-Jewish women, whom they despised as non-Jews yet idealized as avatars of alien sexual desirability. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-qmVq80I7YMs/WskJWv8u4GI/AAAAAAAABjE/tUyKMlRuXHIsoCUTZWyg7h9nYqYlC5XhwCLcBGAs/s1600/Monroe.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="600" data-original-width="469" height="200" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-qmVq80I7YMs/WskJWv8u4GI/AAAAAAAABjE/tUyKMlRuXHIsoCUTZWyg7h9nYqYlC5XhwCLcBGAs/s200/Monroe.jpg" width="156" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The shiksa thus became the ultimate sexual trophy. The Jews who ruled Hollywood, noted Hollywood rabbi Edgar Magnin, <b>"were men who made all that money and realized they were still a bunch of Goddamned Jews. Sleeping with a pretty gentile girl made them feel, if only for a few minutes, 'I'm half gentile.'</b> No wonder they made idols out of shiksa goddesses."</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A key agent in accelerating Monroe's early career was Johnny Hyde (like many Hollywood Jews, born in Russia, and a veteran of vaudeville.) She was also his mistress; he was 53, she was 23. Hyde "not so coincidentally ... was Ted Lewis' personal manager" (Jordan, 85). "In making Marilyn known," says Fred Guiles, "[Hyde] flexed a lot of muscle. The simple fact is that Johnny Hyde was the chief architect of her fame and her eventual legend" (Guiles, 147).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
"By 1953," Jordan reports, "... [Monroe] could be virulently anti-Semitic (a prejudice that grew as she got older). To my discomfort she would sometimes refer to Joe Schenck, the mogul [and another sexual stepping stone], as 'that Jew shit' and to other Hollywood personalities as 'Jew' this or that. Occasionally I would have to remind her that I was half Jewish" (Jordan, 188). Monroe's anti-Semitism did not prevent her from later converting to Judaism, at the behest of her Jewish husband, playwright Arthur Miller, who (despite his vocal anti-racialism) would not wed an uncoverted Gentile.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The Hollywood world and its pressures of being a sex goddess of course destroyed her. Monroe's physician Hyman Engelberg and her therapist Ralph Greenson were the first to her death scene, reported to be the result of a drug overdose, but they did not call police for four hours. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
One investigative author, Donald Spoto, in a 1993 work, even burdens Greenson with the responsibility for killing her, directing that a female employee "administer [to Monroe] ... a fatal barbiturate-laced enema." (In this scenario, Greenson's motivation was that Monroe was trying to free herself from his influence and control, and had fired him [Wolfe, 99]).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A friend of Monroe's recalls that she was beginning to feel that Greenson was "trying to substitute himself for everything she'd built up those past years. She decided he was anti-everything she wanted. She was radically turning on Greenson and Mrs. Murray, the woman he'd put with her, she felt, to spy on her" (Strasberg, 250-251).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The famous movie star's alleged suicide has always been controversial, and there are various conspiracy notions about who would want her dead. Greenson's secret life is much clouded. As well as being a therapist, he was an activist Communist Party member and part of its international Comintern. Greenson, as his sister Elizabeth has reported, was also a Zionist with "strong ties to Israel" (Kelley, 305).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Whatever Greenson's role as a listener of movie star's confessions, his communist ties have profound implications because Monroe had romantic affairs with President John F. Kennedy and knew a great deal about behind-the-scenes politicking, perhaps including plans against communist Cuba and Fidel Castro. Everything Monroe knew she undoubtedly told her psychotherapist. As Donald Wolfe writes:</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="text-align: justify;">
Once Marilyn Monroe became Greenson's patient, he became one of the most important Comintern operatives in America; he had access to the mind of a woman who often shared the bed with the president of the United States and was an intimate of the attorney general [Kennedy's brother, Robert] </blockquote>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
... As Greenson has correctly stated, Marilyn Monroe had a tendency to 'get involved with very destructive people, who will engage in some sort of sado-masochistic relationship with her.' </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Ironically, among these people was her psychiatrist [Greenson], her physician [Engelberg], and her housekeeper, Eunice Murray [who was appointed by Greenson to live with Ms. Monroe and report back to him], who joined in a conspiracy to survey Marilyn Monroe within a sphere of influence designed to gather intelligence from her relationship with the president of the United States and the attorney general (Wolfe, 386).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Marilyn Monroe's road to psychoanalysis was directed by the influential Jewish acting teacher, Lee Strasberg, who is usually credited with spawning "method acting," made famous by the likes of Marlon Brando and James Dean. Brando's first Jewish analyst, early in his career, was Bela Mittelman, "the coldest man I've ever known." ... "Acting afforded me the luxury of being able to spend thousands of dollars on psychoanalysts, most of whom did nothing but convince me that most New York and Beverly Hills psychoanalysts are a little crazy themselves, as well as highly motivated to separate patients from their money while making their emotional problems worse" (Brando, 124, 243). </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Brando was not much endeared to Lee Strasberg either, calling him "an ambitious, selfish man who exploited the people who attended the Actors Studio, and he tried to project himself as an acting oracle and guru. Some people worshiped him, but I never knew why" (Brando, 85). Strasberg's daughter, Susan, notes that her father "sent numerous actors to psychiatrists, and many doctors sent their patients to class because they felt his work helped theirs in analysis" (Strasberg, 31). </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Susan Strasberg herself used to argue with Marilyn Monroe about whether she or the famous sex goddess "needed therapy more" (Strasberg, 138). As Barbara Leaming observes:</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="text-align: justify;">
It was said that the master teacher Lee Strasberg could open inner doors that one scarcely knew existed. Some admirers called him the Rabbi. Some compared him to a psychiatrist or a highly judgmental Jewish father ... Strasberg focused on psychology. He ran his workshop as though they were group therapy sessions... Strasberg often advised actors to enter psychoanalysis in order to put them in touch with emotionally-charged material they could use in their work" (Leaming, 156-157).</blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-FlLtre5oN5s/WskJwXO9ASI/AAAAAAAABjQ/fTwiWdBRi8c1VDiMwnQBQG1mrBerJD2zQCLcBGAs/s1600/Monroe_Rose.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="637" data-original-width="479" height="200" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-FlLtre5oN5s/WskJwXO9ASI/AAAAAAAABjQ/fTwiWdBRi8c1VDiMwnQBQG1mrBerJD2zQCLcBGAs/s200/Monroe_Rose.jpg" width="150" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Under Lee Strasberg's influence Marilyn became an earnest devotee not just of method acting, but of Freudian analysis as well. Monroe's one-time husband, Jewish playwright Arthur Miller, also had his own Jewish psychoanalyst: Rudolph Loewenstein. Monroe even had sessions with Sigmund's Freud daughter, </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Anna, also a therapist, in London. "The significance of [Monroe's reliance on psychoanalysts] for psychoanalysis," notes Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson, "was that Monroe left a substantial part of her estate to further the work of Anna Freud, whom she had seen briefly for analytic help in 1956 (Anna Freud wrote about her that she was paranoid with schizophrenic traits), and this bequest was undoubtedly achieved through her analysts, who were intimately connected to Anna Freud" (Masson, 129). As Masson, a former offical at the Sigmund Freud Archives, further notes about the ethical undercurrent of such funding: </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="text-align: justify;">
It is not, in fact, uncommon for analysts to solicit, usually through roundabout methods, former patients for money to support analytic projects. Chairs of psychoanalysis in medical schools at various universities have been partially endowed through former patients.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="text-align: justify;">
There was also the case of the Centenary Fund, named for the centenary, in 1956, of Freud's birth. [Marilyn Monroe's therapist Ralph] Greenson had organized this fund for psychoanalytic research in Los Angeles ... I felt then, and still do now, that it is an exploitation of the emotional relationship with a patient to solicit money, in whatever form, directly or indirectly. It seems to me that the patient, or ex-patient, is in no position, emotionally speaking, to refuse ... I find it wrong and morally distasteful" (Masson, 130).</blockquote>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A Monroe friend once stated that "I felt [Ralph Greenson] had a big ego, like a lot of doctors he wanted to be God, and of all the analysts in L.A. she found him. Inger Stevens was his patient too. She killed herself later" (Strasberg, 250). As Greenson once claimed, "I can count [on] Marilyn to do anything I want her to do" (Wolfe, 422).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-uDWtin-mlI8/WskKJF1DT2I/AAAAAAAABjY/BFc5lxvqTWYFplPXY_DOC5aFf1rR-8mRACLcBGAs/s1600/Sad_Monroe.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="354" data-original-width="566" height="250" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-uDWtin-mlI8/WskKJF1DT2I/AAAAAAAABjY/BFc5lxvqTWYFplPXY_DOC5aFf1rR-8mRACLcBGAs/s400/Sad_Monroe.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01629699587180617271noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-32761389521600711372018-03-31T12:28:00.000+01:002018-03-31T12:28:22.227+01:00Why Hatred of Whites Is Here to Stay<div style="text-align: justify;">
Not so long ago, mere mention of the deliberate murder of whites in South Africa—country folk and commercial farmers, in particular—was called “racist.” “Raaacist!” the media collective brayed when candidate Trump retweeted a related “white genocide” hashtag.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It’s still “racist” to suggest that the butchering of these whites, almost daily, in ways that beggar belief, is racially motivated. Positively scandalous is it to describe the ultimate goal of a killing spree, now in its third decade, thus: the ethnic cleansing of white, farming South Africa from land the community has cultivated since the 1600s.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Be thankful for small mercies: At least the international media monopoly is finally reporting facts, such as that just the other day Andre and Lydia Saaiman, aged 70, were hacked to death in Port Elizabeth. (Imagine being chopped up until you expire.)</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Or, that the elderly Bokkie Potgieter was dealt a similar fate as he tended his small, KwaZulu-Natal holding. Potgeiter was butchered during the October “Black Monday” protest, which was a nation-wide demonstration to end the carnage. Internationally reported as well were the facts of Sue Howarth’s death. The 64-year-old pharmaceutical executive was tortured for hours with … a blowtorch.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This black-on-white murder spree has been ongoing since a dominant-party political dispensation (mobocracy) was negotiated in my homeland for South Africans. (Learn about “The American Architects of The South-African Catastrophe.“) But while the criminal evidence is at last out in the open, the motive for these hate crimes is only mumbled about for fear of offending the offenders.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In South Africa we find a criminal class, born into freedom after 1994, that burns with white-hot hatred for whites.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Why?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The South African state’s stout indifference to the plight of whites does not exist in a void. Witness the steady, anti-white venom the dominant-party cobra-head, the ANC, spits out. “The de facto situation is that whites are under criminal siege explicitly because of their race,” writes a South African historian, cited in “Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for America from Post-Apartheid South Africa” (2011).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
“The black criminal collective consciousness understands whites are now historical fair game.”</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The physical, existential vulnerability of white South Africans flows from a confluence of historical antecedents that have placed them in a uniquely precarious position. “The white minority surrendered political dominance in return for non-racial constitutional safeguards.” By forswearing control over the state apparatus, whites ceded mastery over their destiny, vesting their existential survival in a political dispensation: a liberal democracy.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In a needlessly optimistic assumption, whites imagined blacks too would be bound by the same political abstractions, and would relinquish race in favor of a constitutional design as an organizing principle in the society they now controlled.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Having “surrendered without defeat,” for a tepid peace, Europeans are, moreover, particularly and uniquely vulnerable within this political dispensation because of their history on the continent. Remedial historical revisionism notwithstanding, South Africa—with its space program and skyscrapers—was not the product of the people currently dismantling it. Rather, it was the creation of British and Dutch settlers and their descendants.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
For what they’ve achieved and acquired—and for the original sins of apartheid in South Africa; slavery in America—whites are the objects of envy and racial enmity.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The observations of liberal, African-American journalist Keith Richburg are particularly pertinent here. Richburg believes that on the Dark Continent, tribal allegiance trumps political persuasion and envy carries the day. He cites the fate of the Tutsi—an alien, Nilotic African people, who formed a minority in Rwanda and Burundi—among the Hutu who are a Bantu people.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The Hutu have always resented the tall, imposing, attractive Tutsis, who had dominated them on-and-off since the 15th century. When Hutus picked up machetes to slash to bits nearly a million of their Tutsi neighbors in the 1994 Rwandan genocide, they were, on a deeper level, contends Richburg, “slashing at their own perceived ugliness, as if destroying this thing of beauty, this thing they could never really attain, removing it from the earth forever.”</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Are shades of this impulse alive in the savagery inflicted on the European “settlers” of South Africa (and Zimbabwe and the Congo before them)? Who can say for sure? This much I know: Empowering political majorities in Africa has helped, not hindered, the propensity of hostile masses to exact revenge on helpless minorities.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It would be a mistake to believe, as the American ruling Idiocracy preaches, that minorities in the US—soon to form a majority—will relinquish race and tribe as unifying principles, in favor of the US’s constitutional design.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Like South Africa, America is a creation of (northwest) European settlers. And it is in Man’s nature to dislike those who are unlike him—all the more so when they, as a group, have accomplished what he has not.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01629699587180617271noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-36276062240923000362016-12-27T13:47:00.002+00:002016-12-27T13:47:31.960+00:00Rodrigo Duterte<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-GefB3R_UQYU/WGJw4Fk7CYI/AAAAAAAAAok/1gj3yXkwxjcdPVokuP5_jC-2dlFmlM5hgCLcB/s1600/Noname.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="326" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-GefB3R_UQYU/WGJw4Fk7CYI/AAAAAAAAAok/1gj3yXkwxjcdPVokuP5_jC-2dlFmlM5hgCLcB/s640/Noname.png" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-88483398601082580972016-12-25T21:24:00.000+00:002016-12-25T21:24:22.633+00:00"We (((white))) people"<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-eVtJtvPLnWg/WGA40FJMuPI/AAAAAAAAAoE/b8PO2twr5h42JU6ENVKbjCTAB4AP2tLUgCLcB/s1600/WeWhites.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-eVtJtvPLnWg/WGA40FJMuPI/AAAAAAAAAoE/b8PO2twr5h42JU6ENVKbjCTAB4AP2tLUgCLcB/s640/WeWhites.png" width="490" /></a></div>
<br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-32806486613248133882016-12-25T14:52:00.003+00:002016-12-25T14:52:42.028+00:00Chilfree<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-2yi3ovU-Umc/WF_dDEilSiI/AAAAAAAAAno/1S_57PToHxcP-p3iX3ZcEGBs7V0G-hUvQCLcB/s1600/01.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-2yi3ovU-Umc/WF_dDEilSiI/AAAAAAAAAno/1S_57PToHxcP-p3iX3ZcEGBs7V0G-hUvQCLcB/s400/01.jpg" width="298" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-umqRsqeIdC0/WF_dC9cytPI/AAAAAAAAAnk/WaFJ7LgcGE8Bs6njmFyqEDntHaOVpMRigCLcB/s1600/02%2BTime.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-umqRsqeIdC0/WF_dC9cytPI/AAAAAAAAAnk/WaFJ7LgcGE8Bs6njmFyqEDntHaOVpMRigCLcB/s400/02%2BTime.jpg" width="300" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-lV1BiwuJHiI/WF_dDFNNldI/AAAAAAAAAns/4H4OLlfgBfcQMETJiVKanAAq5s5ixCRgQCLcB/s1600/03%2BThe%2BBlog.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-lV1BiwuJHiI/WF_dDFNNldI/AAAAAAAAAns/4H4OLlfgBfcQMETJiVKanAAq5s5ixCRgQCLcB/s400/03%2BThe%2BBlog.jpg" width="316" /></a></div>
<br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-82795168551124911822016-12-08T16:06:00.000+00:002016-12-08T16:06:12.198+00:00You must choseBut chose wisely.....
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-bYfwYcmq9oc/WEmEi0f38gI/AAAAAAAABTo/sPOQbbR_4pYZTMOBozUhbAVIHG5vj5YwgCLcB/s1600/JewishAmerica.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="203" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-bYfwYcmq9oc/WEmEi0f38gI/AAAAAAAABTo/sPOQbbR_4pYZTMOBozUhbAVIHG5vj5YwgCLcB/s400/JewishAmerica.png" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-37091781747131998082016-09-17T23:54:00.000+01:002016-09-17T23:54:25.575+01:00The jewish "holocaust" in numbers<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-SJWt3AIzri0/V93JO7u1yyI/AAAAAAAADSs/uMaN-9cOxgs1d5nIxKdUBUpuNHH_ECQAgCLcB/s1600/Matem%25C3%25A1tica.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="286" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-SJWt3AIzri0/V93JO7u1yyI/AAAAAAAADSs/uMaN-9cOxgs1d5nIxKdUBUpuNHH_ECQAgCLcB/s400/Matem%25C3%25A1tica.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-35938278506342303132016-03-17T17:04:00.003+00:002016-03-17T17:04:36.013+00:00Full Speech Of Rabbi Rabbinovitch Found<div style="text-align: justify;">
Commentary By Rose Rabbinovich<br />
rabbinovich@bluemail.ch<br />
Former Zionist - Melbourne, Victoria, Australia<br />
11-30-3<br />
<br />
Hello again Jeff,<br />
<br />
Thank you for posting my commentary last week 'Our Race Will Rule Undisputed Over The World' http://rense.com/general45/race.htm , it seems that this article shocked many Jews around the world. I have been inundated with hundreds of e-mail. I would like to apologise to many of you for not replying, I promise that I will reply to each one of you in time. If any of you had email 'problems' trying to contact me, please try again.<br />
<br />
One question which was repeated in many of the emails to me was: 'How can we find the full Rabbinovich speech?'<br />
<br />
I searched the Internet, but all websites with Rabbi Rabbinovich speech have been 'cleaned up' or blocked (I assume by the Zionists, as usual). Since I remember hearing from my grandfather about this speech already in the fifties, I decided to contact my Rabbi. He searched his favourite website http://abbc.com/ and found the full article. I am enclosing here the full speech by Rabbi Rabbinovich (Rabinovich).<br />
<br />
To tell you the truth, I was surprised at the fantastic reaction of your readers to this speech. After all there is little new in that speech, and most people who read the Elders Of Zion Protocols are already very familiar with this information. Unfortunately we Jews are NOT allowed to read the Protocols, as the Zionists want to keep us uninformed to the hidden agenda of Zionism.<br />
<br />
Some of the email I received claimed that The Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion are a forgery.<br />
<br />
To this I have five comments:<br />
<br />
<br />
1. If it is a 'forgery', it implies that there is an original somewhere, WHERE IS IT? WHO WROTE IT?<br />
<br />
2. Whether it is a forgery or not IS IRRELEVANT for the simple reason that our Zionist 'Jewish' 'brothers' have already implemented most, if not all of it. That is a fact. Every Jew who reads the Protocols knows that it was written by Jews, NO ONE ELSE could have written them.<br />
<br />
3. The gentiles are really stupid (sorry), until now, they did not realise yet that the Zionists essentially control them.<br />
<br />
4. It is VERY sad that most honest and honorable Jewish thinkers and intellectuals' articles are posted today on Moslem websites only.<br />
<br />
5. As a person who grew up on Jewish ethics, I am at a great loss and shame to see our Zionist Rabbis justifying the present Moslem holocaust in the name of God and our Jewish religion. One thing I am sure of, if there is God, he is NOT 'Zionistically' Jewish. After reading many non-Zionists Jewish websites, I started believing as do many Rabbis in New York, that Zionism is: Satan hijacking our Jewish religion.<br />
<br />
Some of the emails were complaints that they could not buy The Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion. This is true, as we Jews control most of the printing and book distribution in the USA and many other countries. I had to go myself to: http://churchoftrueisrael.com/protocols/<br />
<br />
I printed it and made 100 copies, and distributed them to ALL my friends and ALL members of my synagogue. I encouraged everyone to distribute them to as many friends as possible. Unless the stupid gentiles understand the Zionist agenda, we are marching blindly into WW3 as lemmings off the cliff.<br />
<br />
I would like to thank you, Jeff, for your wonderful website and for being the best source of knowledge on the Internet for Jews. I took the time to write you this second comment as I feel that it is OUR responsibility as Jews to alert the world to the dangers of Zionism.<br />
<br />
Sincerely,<br />
<br />
Rose Rabbinovich<br />
rabbinovich@bluemail.ch<br />
Former Zionist<br />
Melbourne, Victoria,<br />
Australia<br />
<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a><br />
<br />
http://abbc.com/quotes/q001-050.htm<br />
<br />
RABBI RABINOVICH'S SPEECH OF JANUARY 12TH, 1952<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-n0vgbtliavg/VurjbucOO7I/AAAAAAAAbA0/8Ya47XyY_agh5fgSMgPUjBNQVVszWJcEQ/s1600/099%2BRabbi-Emanuel-Rabinovich.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-n0vgbtliavg/VurjbucOO7I/AAAAAAAAbA0/8Ya47XyY_agh5fgSMgPUjBNQVVszWJcEQ/s1600/099%2BRabbi-Emanuel-Rabinovich.jpg" /></a></div>
A report from Europe carried the following speech of Rabbi Emmanuel Rabinovich before a special meeting of the Emergency Council of European Rabbis in Budapest, Hungary, January 12, 1952: "Greetings, my children; You have been called her to recapitulate the principal steps of our new program. As you know, we had hoped to have twenty years between wars to consolidate the great gains which we made from World War II, but our increasing numbers in certain vital areas is arousing opposition to us, and we must now work with every means at our disposal to precipitate World War III within five years [They did not precipitate World War III but they did instigate the Korean War when on June 25, 1950 they ordered the North Korean army to launch a surprise attack on South Korea.<br />
<br />
On June 26, the U.N. Security Council condemned the invasion as aggression and ordered withdrawal of the invading forces. Then on June 27, 1950, our Jewish American President Truman ordered air and naval units into action to enforce the U.N. order. Not achieving their full goals, they then instigated the overthrow of South Vietnam Ngo Dinh Diem, Premier under Bao Dai, who deposed the monarch in 1955 and established a republic with himself as President. Diem used strong U.S. backing to create an authoritarian regime, which soon grew into a full-scale war, with Jewish pressure escalating U.S. involvement].<br />
<br />
The goal for which we have striven so concertedly for three thousand years is at last within our reach, and because its fulfillment is so apparent, it behooves us to increase our efforts and our caution tenfold. I can safely promise you that before ten years have passed, our race will take its rightful place in the world, with every Jew a king and every Gentile a slave (Applause from the gathering). You remember the success of our propaganda campaign during the 1930's, which aroused anti-American passions in Germany at the same time we were arousing anti-German passions in America, a campaign which culminated in the Second World War.<br />
<br />
A similar propaganda campaign is now being waged intensively throughout the world. A war fever is being worked up in Russia by an incessant anti-American barrage while a nation-wide anti-Communist scare is sweeping America. This campaign is forcing all the smaller nations to choose between the partnership of Russia or an alliance with the United States. Our most pressing problem at the moment is to inflame the lagging militaristic spirit of the Americans. The failure of the Universal Military Training Act was a great setback to our plans, but we are assured that a suitable measure will be rushed through Congress immediately after the 1952 elections.<br />
<br />
The Russians, as well as the Asiatic peoples, are well under control and offer no objections to war, but we must wait to secure the Americans. This we hope to do with the issue of Anti-Semitism, which worked so well in uniting the Americans against Germany. We are counting heavily on reports of anti-Semitic outrages in Russia to whip up indignation in the United States and produce a front of solidarity against the Soviet power. Simultaneously, to demonstrate to Americans the reality of anti-Semitism, we will advance through new sources large sums of money to outspokenly anti-Semitic elements in America to increase their effectiveness, and we shall stage Anti-Semitic outbreaks in several of their largest cities.<br />
<br />
This will serve the double purpose of exposing reactionary sectors in America, which then can be silenced, and of welding the United States into a devoted anti-Russian unit. (Note: -- Protocol of Zion No. 9, para. 2, states that anti-Semitism is controlled by them. At the time of this speech they had already commenced their campaign of anti-Semitism in Czechoslovakia). Within five years, this program will achieve its objective, the Third World War, which will surpass in destruction all previous contests. Israeli, of course, will remain neutral, and when both sides are devastated and exhausted, we will arbitrate, sending our Control Commissions into all wrecked countries. This war will end for all time our struggle against the Gentiles.<br />
<br />
We will openly reveal our identity with the races of Asia and Africa. I can state with assurance that the last generation of white children is now being born. Our Control Commissions will, in the interests of peace and wiping out inter- racial tensions.<br />
<br />
Forbid the Whites to mate with Whites. The White Women must cohabit with members of the dark races, the White Men with black women. Thus the White Race will disappear, for the mixing of the dark with the White means the end of the White Man, and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory. We shall embark upon an era of ten thousand years of peace and plenty, the Pax Judaica, and our race will rule undisputed over the world. Our superior intelligence will easily enable us to retain mastery over a world of dark peoples.<br />
<br />
Question from the gathering: Rabbi Rabinovich, what about the various religions after the Third World War?<br />
<br />
Rabinovich: There will be no more religions. Not only would the existence of a priest class remain a constant danger to our rule, but belief in an after-life would give spiritual strength to irreconcilable elements in many countries, and enable them to resist us. We will, however, retain the rituals and customs of Judaism as the mark of our hereditary ruling caste, strengthening our racial laws so that no Jew will be allowed to marry outside our race, nor will any stranger be accepted by us. (Note: Protocol of Zion No. 17 para. 2, states: 'Now that freedom of conscience has been declared everywhere (as a result of their efforts they have previously stated) only years divide us from the moment of the complete wrecking of that [Hated] Christian Religion. As to other religions, we shall have still less difficulty with them.')<br />
<br />
We may have to repeat the grim days of World War II, when we were forced to let the Hitlerite bandits sacrifice some of our people, in order that we may have adequate documentation and witnesses to legally justify our trial and execution of the leaders of America and Russia as war criminals, after we have dictated the peace. I am sure you will need little preparation for such a duty, for sacrifice has always been the watchword of our people, and the death of a few thousand lesser Jews in exchange for world leadership is indeed a small price to pay. To convince you of the certainty of that leadership, let me point out to you how we have turned all of the inventions of the White Man into weapons against him. His printing presses and Radios are the mouthpieces of our desires, and his heavy industry manufactures the instruments which he sends out to arm Asia and Africa against him.<br />
<br />
Our interests in Washington are greatly extending the Point Four Program (viz. Colombo Plan) for developing industry in backward areas of the world, so that after the industrial plants and cities of Europe and America are destroyed by atomic warfare, the Whites can offer no resistance against the large masses of the dark races, who will maintain an unchallenged technological superiority.<br />
<br />
And so, with the vision of world victory before you, go back to your countries and intensify your good work, until that approaching day when Israeli will reveal herself in all her glorious destiny as the Light of the World." (Note: Every statement made by Rabinovich is based on agenda contained in the "Protocols of Zion.")<br />
<br />
Comment<br />
From Name Witheld<br />
12-1-3<br />
<br />
Nice find, but I object to being classed as a stupid Gentile. After all in the article the recently awakened Rose Rabbinovich marvels at all the emails she received from shocked Jews around the world who apparently were ignorant of the fact that they are being manipulated by Zionists. Join the club Rose! I won't use the 'stupid' word. Ignorance and stupidity are not the same thing, and 'willful ignorance' is again something entirely different.<br />
<br />
Rose your Zionist past seems to crop up when you say the Protocols could ONLY be written by Jews. Do you mean Khazars, Sephardic Jews or maybe people of the Semitic language group who were followers of some ancient Satanic cult? Personally I agree with Makow and his reasoning when he suggests that they were probably written by or with Rothschild.<br />
<br />
Alright sniping shall cease, we are on the same side, at the very least looking for the truth and attempting to banish ignorance. By the way, the Protocols are available on Amazon.<br />
<br />
Please do not print my name or email address; I don't need these neo-Nazi nutcases spamming me. Many thanks for helping to set the record straight"<br />
<br />
<br />
Comment<br />
From ZulaZorana<br />
12-1-3<br />
<br />
Dear Jeff - Where would we be without you? May God shower you with blessings for the wonderful job you are doing. I just wanted to comment on the article of Kol Nidre and the Comment from<br />
Name Withheld -<br />
<br />
"Please do not print my name or email address; I don't need these neo-Nazi nutcases spamming me. Many thanks for helping to set the record straight"<br />
<br />
Good for you, Name Witheld. It seems that you are living in a different world from the rest of humanity. Because we the inferior Goyim of this world (which is the majority) haven't had the record straight for more than a century.<br />
<br />
All the people I know who have woken up to the Zionist conspiracy are in no way "neo-Nazi nutcases". To tell you the truth I have never met a neo-Nazi. I can only guess how bad it must have been for Jews to live in Nazi Germany when I see on the news how bad it is for the Palestinians living under Zionism. To tell the truth, the closest I have been to a neo-Nazi (which I believe is all about violent racism) is when I read in Newsgroups how Jewish people talk about Arabs being inferior, and how superior Jewish people are.<br />
<br />
Many times, I have tried to post articles to Jewish newsgroups making it clear that due to Ethnicity, age group and gender, I cannot be catalogued under this term. And my postings never get through. I notice they only let posters through who are clearly white supremacists. I consider this to be very manipulative. And then these Zionists become 'angry' when we believe the stuff that is written about them. How can we not believe it when this information is being personally confirmed every step of the way?<br />
<br />
Whom do they think they are fooling? 59% of Europe cannot be KKK or white supremacist. Wake up, Name Withheld!! Times are changing and the truth is being shouted from the rooftops!! The unstoppable Wave of Truth is here, and if you try to get in its way it will just blow you away. Incidentally, I am not Arabic and have no religion or political affiliation...I am just another inferior, stupid Goy.<br />
<br />
Zula<br />
<br />
Responses Sent In By Rose Rabbinovich<br />
Comment<br />
Dear Rose,<br />
<br />
Thank you for posting this. The situation is too far gone for Gentiles to do anything about it, especially since all their leaders appear to be Zionist pawns. They certainly run the risk of having massive "terrorist" strikes, carried out by the usual suspects, in their cities. Only Jews of conscience can turn this thing around. If they do, a great work will be accomplished. If they don't, when the tide turns, and surely it will turn--just as day follows night, there will be immense suffering for the Jew everywhere.<br />
<br />
Good luck.<br />
hj<br />
<br />
<br />
Comment<br />
Rose,<br />
<br />
For some time now, I've worked to separate the "wacko conspiracy stuff" from the more occult truth of the movement of world history - your recent contribution to the Rense.com website was quite welcome. I found in it many of the missing holes in my own observation of events. Things that puzzled me now make sense.<br />
<br />
My 'gift' from my Creator has been to pull together abstract and seemingly unrelated "things" into a coherent pattern - this I've done for years on a variety of jobs and career endeavors. Several years ago I purchased a simple handgun because I could here in Arizona. Being a good citizen I began to research what the rules were of gun ownership. Thus began my journey into issues, subjects and things I sometimes wish I'd never uncovered.<br />
<br />
You see, to me a loose thread must lead somewhere - so, I picked up the tread and began to unravel things. One of those "things" which has always bothered me was the ubiquitous "they" that seem to come up in discussions of conspiracy - who are "they"??<br />
<br />
My research was given a warp drive boost following the Oklahoma City bombing which I watched on TV from only moments after the blast and through the entire day. Changes I noted in the early broadcasts seemed to morph as the day moved forward. I watched the damned reports and, as if by some magic, the story had changed to what is now the "official" version. I wasn't loosing my mind - I heard the local sheriff confirm that his bomb squad had found the second, and shortly later the third un-expolded bombs. I saw the bomb crater only minutes after the dust had settled.<br />
<br />
Something was amiss. Since then I've been putting together the pieces - always insisting on solid verification, documentation, and facts. I do not deal in conjecture or speculation.<br />
<br />
I know more than I wish to know now. It is a burden. Especially since there are few whom I can discuss such things, as the Bilderberg for example, with. Most people are sheeple and, who knows - maybe they deserve what is to come?? I don't know.<br />
<br />
It is bigger than I - my timeline for 2007 - 2017 frightens me - where can someone take shelter from the coming storm - the perfect storm?<br />
<br />
Anyway - thanks for listening and thanks for posting the information you have - visit my latest column listed below. The US Mexican border is my prime focus these days, so I write on immigration issues.<br />
<br />
Keep the Faith, Bruce Barton<br />
<br />
<br />
Comment<br />
From Khut Mau<br />
Dear Ms Rabbinowich,<br />
<br />
I believe the Protocols were originally concocted in Russia as a bit of inflamatory propaganda by he Czarist Secret Police chief. One thing that seems to indicate they are not of Jewish origin is the degrees listed therein, which seems more relative to a Masonic Order.<br />
<br />
Evil takes many forms and lodges in many different hearts. In this world there are swords of Light and Dark. That is the only division I recognize. There are many swords of Light in Isreal and alas many swords of Darkenss too. We must support the Light, wherever it may be: Isreal, Palestine, Russia China, Iraq, every place in the world is that chessboard.<br />
<br />
Sincerely,<br />
Nebt Khut Mau<br />
<br />
<br />
Comment<br />
Dear Rose,<br />
<br />
You are absolutely correct! It does not matter who wrote what. What matters is the truth. I thank you for educating us on what Mr. Rabinovich wrote. When stupid gentiles write stupid remarks to you, questioning the authenticity of the report, then they are stupid enough to allow themselves to be ruled by others, rather than be grateful for the truth and think for themselves.<br />
<br />
I am in agreement with you. It is ironic that the Zionists are gentiles, too, and are not related to the historical Jews and the land of Israel. Remember what Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews of antiquity, said, "Woe unto those who call themselves Jews and are not..."<br />
<br />
The Zionists will bring upon themselves damnation and judgment. And if you think it's pathetic that Jews are fleeing Israel now, just wait until the Zionists place the anti-Christ on the throne in the temple to be worshiped, causing the Abomination of Desoloation, spoken of by Daniel. When that happens, the Jews will flee Israel even faster.<br />
<br />
Be assured that there is a God!<br />
<br />
Yours sincerely,<br />
<br />
Jim Linzey<br />
<br />
<br />
Comment<br />
From David Friedman<br />
A B <d3rdclsmail@earthlink.net><br />
12-3-3<br />
<br />
Jeff and readers of rense.com,<br />
<br />
I know you are all feeling smug and enlightened now that you think you've nailed the Je-- er, Zionist conspiracy(*). I hate to burst your bubble, but you have been fooled. The "Rose Rabbinovich" message is just another sorry ex-Je-I-mean-Zionist-confesses piece of propaganda. I wish I could say "Rose" is not fooling anybody, but judging by the comments, this is apparently not so. Let's take the message point by point.<br />
<br />
I searched the Internet, but all websites with Rabbi Rabbinovich speech have<br />
been 'cleaned up' or blocked (I assume by the Zionists, as usual).<br />
<br />
This is nonsense. There could be no such thing as a "cleaned-up" version of that vile writing. I had no trouble finding it on the popular Jew-hating sites (www.biblebelievers.org.au, www.stormfront.org, www.jewwatch.com, www.skrewdriver.net, etc..). I also found references to the speech being a fabrication by Eustace Mullins:<br />
<br />
http://www.freehomepages.com/itma99/eustace_mullins_7.html<br />
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=1993Dec19.052509.26880%40lugb.latrobe.edu.au&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain<br />
<br />
I decided to contact my Rabbi. He searched his favourite website http://abbc.com/<br />
and found the full article.<br />
<br />
People, http://abbc.com/ is "Radio Islam". Quote: "Judaism =Racism, Domination, Dccupation [sic]." This is the alleged Rabbi's favorite site?!<br />
<br />
Unfortunately we Jews are NOT allowed to read the Protocols, as the Zionists<br />
want to keep us uninformed to the hidden agenda of Zionism."<br />
<br />
WHO is not allowing Jews to read the protocols? Does Rose belong to some strange cult that controls here access to media?<br />
<br />
1. If it is a 'forgery', it implies that there is an original somewhere,<br />
WHERE IS IT? WHO WROTE IT?<br />
<br />
If it is NOT a "forgery", it implies that there is an original somewhere. WHERE IS IT? WHO WROTE IT? I'm sure you'll be disappointed, "Rose", but the Protocols have already been debunked. The information is even on Rense's own site: http://www.rense.com/politics2/wcon.htm.<br />
<br />
2. Whether it is a forgery or not IS IRRELEVANT for the simple reason that<br />
our Zionist 'Jewish' 'brothers' have already implemented most, if not all of it.<br />
That is a fact. Every Jew who reads the Protocols knows that it was written by<br />
Jews, NO ONE ELSE could have written them.<br />
<br />
No one else could have written the Protocols? Oh, no. Certainly not someone wishing to slander Jews and distract from a real conspiracy (see the above link.)<br />
<br />
By this reasoning, it could be stated: "Whether or not Muslims perpetrated the 9-11 attacks is IRRELEVANT. The fact is we have been attacked! It must have been the Muslims; NO ONE ELSE could have done it." Oh, "Rose", don't you see you are working against yourself?<br />
<br />
3. The gentiles are really stupid (sorry), until now, they did not realise yet that<br />
the Zionists essentially control them.<br />
<br />
"Rose", your message speaks volumes about your opinion of the audience's intelligence.<br />
<br />
4. It is VERY sad that most honest and honorable Jewish thinkers and intellectuals'<br />
articles are posted today on Moslem websites only.<br />
<br />
Strange, that. Of course, by "honest and honorable," you mean the likes of Israel Shahak, who promoted slanderous lies about the Talmud (i.e., Jews) that have been disproved over and over again.<br />
<br />
http://talmud.faithweb.com/<br />
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Cyprus/8815/exp.html<br />
<br />
By the way, I think it would be nice have these links posted on the main page of rense.com to balance what has recently been posted.<br />
<br />
5. As a person who grew up on Jewish ethics,<br />
<br />
If you "grew up on" Jewish ethics, you would not deal in slander.<br />
<br />
I am at a great loss and shame to see our Zionist Rabbis justifying the present<br />
Moslem holocaust in the name of God and our Jewish religion.<br />
<br />
I am in no way denying the atrocities committed by the military-industry-intelligence complex of Israel, but if you cannot tell by the "voice" that this is of Islamic activist origin, well.. you probably believe the Protocols were written by Jews just because it says so.<br />
<br />
One thing I am sure of, if there is God, he is NOT 'Zionistically' Jewish.<br />
<br />
Are you saying God IS Jewish? What kind of weird cult DO you belong to?!<br />
<br />
After reading many non-Zionists Jewish websites, I started believing as do<br />
many Rabbis in New York, that Zionism is: Satan hijacking our Jewish religion.<br />
<br />
As opposed to rabbis in Toledo. Sorry, "Rose", but a personal Satan is not a boogie-man in the Jewish religion.<br />
<br />
Some of the emails were complaints that they could not buy The Protocols Of The<br />
Elders Of Zion. This is true, as we Jews control most of the printing and book distribution<br />
in the USA and many other countries. I had to go myself to: http://churchoftrueisrael.com/protocols/<br />
<br />
Again, nonsense. The Protocols are easier to find than the Rabonivich speech on the Web and in printed book form. The churchoftrueisrael.com banner reads, "Welcome Aryan Men and Women to the web site created by<br />
and for our race." Is this another one of your rabbi's favorite sites?<br />
<br />
The "speech" itself has already been dealt with, but I will make one comment: Notice how slim the supposed GLOBAL plan is on specifics except for two things: anti-White and anti-Christian statements. Consider the source (the original source, not Radio Islam) and the target audience and THINK.<br />
<br />
(*) Please don't tell me I don't understand the difference between Zionism and Judaism. I am going on what I see at abbc.com. Count the number of times "Jew" and "Judaism" appears versus "Zionism."<br />
<br />
David Friedman<br />
(No need to withold my name.)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.rense.com/general45/full.htm" target="_blank">Source</a></div>
Lucashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02515186017263921231noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-18310248662426735612016-03-03T14:43:00.000+00:002016-03-03T14:43:32.053+00:00Diversity and enrichment<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.blogger.com/video.g?token=AD6v5dy0Su55CYClN5NqOeqT5QAyklpBsQzl7bAxavAbASj1TtA2r_AyJC32ApmYo7EhMm_CcgcEIEdzlCLuNfuEMg' class='b-hbp-video b-uploaded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<br />Lucashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17529021789568484898noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-29832199544332598662015-04-29T21:16:00.000+01:002015-04-29T21:16:00.314+01:00Benjamin Ginsberg on Jewish hypocrisy and double standards<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>Tablet </i>interview: “<a href="http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/146441/qa-benjamin-ginsberg" target="_blank"><b>Q&A: Benjamin Ginsberg, the Author of ‘How the Jews Defeated Hitler</b></a>’”</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-YwmE7EOWjBs/VCca0oN3s7I/AAAAAAAAEzw/mKLqdyUcHY4/s1600/Benjamin-Ginsberg.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-YwmE7EOWjBs/VCca0oN3s7I/AAAAAAAAEzw/mKLqdyUcHY4/s1600/Benjamin-Ginsberg.jpg" height="320" width="207" /></a></div>
[Tablet] <b>One of the things that’s fascinating
about my WASPy friends and compatriots is that so many dislike the State
of Israel, to varying degrees. It bugs them. What interests me is
trying to suss out the underlying or psychological impetus or sense of
injury beneath these feelings, which are frankly less common in general
among American gentiles than they are among American Jews. When I’ve
asked them, “Why does this particular injustice bother you so much – why
not Tibet?” the answers are very interesting. They come down to
something like, “Why on one hand do you Jewish people come to us and say
we have to be democratic and inclusive because otherwise we’re
anti-Semites, and then back in the old country, where you go on your
family vacations or Birthright trips, you get to strut around with
automatic weapons and oppress everybody else, which isn’t fair, and is
probably what we would want to do here, in some secret corner of our
WASPy brains.”</b> </blockquote>
<blockquote>
[Ginsberg] That is a very good line, and I think it’s totally true. The animus is some form of displaced anti-Semitism.</blockquote>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Say what? Displaced anti-Semitism would be if these Whites used
Jewish hypocrisy as an excuse from some deep irrational hatred of Jews.
But isn’t hypocrisy always seen as a negative? The White Protestants who
are on trial here assume a principled morality. They assume that if
inclusiveness is a moral imperative in the U.S. as our intellectual
elites constantly tell us, it must be a moral imperative everywhere. But
many of the same people who advocate inclusiveness in the U.S. advocate
oppression in Israel. And there’s resentment by many Whites because as a
result of the moral imperative of inclusiveness in the U.S., they are
losing the country. So, yes, there is probably a “secret corner” of
their brains where they would like to reassert themselves and boot out
or oppress the interlopers. But that has to remain secret on pain of job
loss and social opprobrium. Because they no longer command the moral
and political high ground, they don’t dare say that.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<blockquote>
<b>[<i>Tablet</i>] Is that what I’m saying? I
actually think that American Jews are in this sense way too quick to
label such feelings as anti-Semitism, even when the effects may be
anti-Semitic.</b> </blockquote>
<blockquote>
[Ginsberg] I think you’ve characterized it very well. It’s not 1930s
anti-Semitism, but it’s a resentment. It’s a resentment of a particular
evil that the Jews have done, which is the Jews have undermined WASP
America but refuse to do the same thing in their own country.<br />
You know, there’s an old joke: Three elderly Jewish Communists in the
Bronx are talking. They’re in their eighties. One is in a wheelchair.
So they say, “Abie Cohen, have you heard from him lately?” “Abie, he’s
had some health problems but he’s living in Los Angeles in a nursing
home, still working for socialism.” “All right, what about Mike
Abramowitz, have you heard from him?” “Well, you know Mike is in rehab,
he fell, he broke his hip, a lot of problems. But even in the nursing
home he’s fighting for socialism!” So someone says, “What about Moe
Goldberg?” “Oh, Moe, he moved to Israel, didn’t you know that?” “Well,
is he fighting for socialism?” The guy answers, “In his own country?
What kind of man do you think he is?!”</blockquote>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The joke would be mildly humorous except that the Jewish left has
been spectacularly successful. So I am not laughing because the not so
hidden agenda of the left has been the displacement of the people and
culture of European societies throughout the West. Again we see the
double standards and hypocrisy inherent in a movement led by strongly
ethnocentric activists intent on displacing the previously dominant
Protestant elite and in the process becoming an elite themselves.
Policies that are advocated in the Diaspora are rejected for Israel. The
Protestant elite that was endlessly criticized for being non-inclusive
turns out to be way more inclusive than their critics.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<blockquote>
So I think as Jewish humor often does, that captures the
point that you made. I’ve actually had students say exactly this. They
say, “How come in my high school we couldn’t sing Christmas carols;
however, in Israel they can establish a religion?” And they believe that
it was the Jews who brought this about in the United States. And are
they wrong? No.</blockquote>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Or to rephrase his comments, I imagine students saying</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<blockquote>
“How come in my high school Whites are a minority in the
same school that was all-White when my parents attended. However, in
Israel they can enact <a href="http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2014/04/is-immigration-really-a-jewish-value/" target="_blank"><b>immigration laws</b> </a>that
keep out non-Jews?” And they believe that it was the Jews who brought
this about in the United States. And are they wrong? No.</blockquote>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Indeed, they are not wrong about <b><a href="http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/CofCchap7.pdf" target="_blank">immgration policy</a> </b>or about<a href="http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/12/yes-virginia-the-jews-stole-christmas/" target="_blank"><b> Christmas carols</b></a>.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Ginsberg’s comments are another example of a phenomenon noticed by <a href="http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2014/09/jews-hollywood-and-gaza-some-thoughts/" target="_blank"><b>Andrew Joyce</b></a>:
“It appears that Jews are becoming more and more flamboyant and
confident (or aggressive) in asserting their dominance. While the ADL
would like us not to think of Jewish power and influence at all, there
are recurrent examples where Jews unabashedly assert their influence.”</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Source: <a href="http://bit.ly/104lO1O">http://bit.ly/104lO1O </a></div>
<br />
<span id="more-24727"></span>Lucashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17529021789568484898noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-30149262335735643412014-08-05T09:05:00.000+01:002014-08-05T09:05:26.232+01:00The Jew as Ally of the Muslim<a href="http://diversitymachtfrei.blogspot.com/2014/07/the-jew-as-ally-of-muslim.html">Source</a><br />
<div class="article-header" style="background-color: white; display: table; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue Light', HelveticaNeue-Light, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; outline: none; padding: 0px; text-align: center; width: 750px;">
<h1 class="title entry-title" itemprop="name" style="color: #333333; display: table-cell; font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 40px 0px 0px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 709px;">
</h1>
</div>
<div class="article-content entry-content" itemprop="articleBody" style="background-color: white; clear: both; color: #333333; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue Light', HelveticaNeue-Light, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.4; margin: 10px auto 5px; outline: none; padding: 0px; text-align: justify;">
<blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; margin: 0px; outline: none; padding: 0px; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-OplTMe75kww/U9D7iS4-lqI/AAAAAAAAIZk/mh5HiklV5gE/s1600/2358.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.3s; color: #009eb8; display: inline; margin-bottom: 0px !important; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em; margin-top: 0px !important; outline: none; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.3s;"><img border="0" class="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-OplTMe75kww/U9D7iS4-lqI/AAAAAAAAIZk/mh5HiklV5gE/s1600/2358.jpg" height="640" style="-webkit-border-image: url(data:image/png; border-image-repeat: stretch; border-image-slice: 9; border-image-source: url(data:image/png; border-image-width: 9px; border: 9px none; box-sizing: border-box; display: inline-block; height: auto; margin: 10px auto; max-width: 100%; padding: 8px; position: relative;" width="442" /></a></div>
</blockquote>
<br />
I was reading a book [in Spanish so I won't post extracts] about the history of Jews in Spain, which essentially confirmed what I had already written about (<a href="http://islamversuseurope.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/jewish-collaboration-with-muslims.html" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.3s; color: #009eb8; display: inline; outline: none; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.3s;">here</a>, <a href="http://islamversuseurope.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/jewish-collaboration-with-muslims.html" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.3s; color: #009eb8; display: inline; outline: none; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.3s;">here</a> and <a href="http://islamversuseurope.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/jewish-collaboration-with-muslims_26.html" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.3s; color: #009eb8; display: inline; outline: none; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.3s;">here</a>), namely Jewish collaboration with Muslim invaders in the post-Roman era. This fact is of central importance to the history of Europe's confrontation with Islam. Yet all of the supposed "Counterjihad" sites, although they regularly feature pieces about the Crusades, 1683, the Battle of Lepanto and so forth, resolutely refuse to mention it. This exposes the Counterjihad movement's essentially fraudulent nature. These people are not primarily interested in resisting Islam. Their goal is to promote the interests of Jewry. Resisting Islam is simply a means of doing that, as they perceive it, and, at best, a secondary objective.<br />
<br />
The book made reference to another book I had never heard of: "The Jew as Ally of the Muslim". Like many books that expose critical truths about Jews, it is not easily available. I will now order an expensive copy from an antiquarian bookshop in the USA. I did, however, find an old (1987) review of it from Daniel Pipes, the Jew who funds Fjordman and could loosely be considered part of the Counterjihad movement today.<br />
<br />
<blockquote>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">As the title of this study suggests, Allan and Helen Cutler believe that <b>the tendency of medieval Christians to see the Jew as an ally of the Muslim was the decisive factor in the development of anti-Semitism</b>. In making their case, the Cutlers challenge conventional wisdom, which holds that anti-Semitism originated in the charge of deicide (that Jews killed Jesus) and the Jews' anomalous socio-economic status in Europe. Although the Cutlers' study is poorly written and far too lengthy, it offers an intriguing and ultimately convincing argument.</span> </blockquote>
<blockquote>
The logic of their case can be reduced to a syllogism: (1) Medieval Christians feared and hated Muslims. (2) Medieval Christians saw Jews as the allies of Muslims. (3) Therefore, medieval Christians feared and hated Jews. </blockquote>
<blockquote>
On the first point, the Cutlers are correct to note the presence of a pervasive fear of Muslims among medieval Christians. That fear began with the emergence of Islam and lasted until the 19th century. In 634, just two years after Muhammad the Prophet's death, for example, the patriarch of Jerusalem referred to the Muslims as "the slime of the godless Saracens [which] threatens slaughter and destruction." This early view was later echoed many times over; for centuries, the role of arch-enemy, in myth and literature, was filled by Muslims. </blockquote>
<blockquote>
This is understandable, for Muslims, who inhabited a belt of territories extending from Morocco to Egypt to Turkey to Siberia, physically surrounded medieval Christendom. Muslims were also the most constant enemy: with only one exception (the Mongols), every serious military threat against Christian Europe after the 10th century was launched by them. The Muslim danger continued to preoccupy the Christians of Europe for more than a millennium, until after the second siege of Vienna in 1683. </blockquote>
<blockquote>
Muslims also differed from the other invaders - Germans, Bulgars, and Hungarians - in presenting a religious and cultural danger as well as a military one. Hungarians would eventually accept European culture and convert to Christianity, but Muslims brought with them a rival civilization which not only withstood Christianity but even seduced Christians from their faith. For all these reasons, Muslims were the outstanding enemy of Christendom. </blockquote>
<blockquote>
Second - and this is the heart of the Cutlers' study - Jews were seen as close associates of Muslims. There was some justice to this view: <b>the Hebrew language shares much with Arabic, and Judaism shares much with Islam; on the most abstract level, both are religions of law, while Christianity is a religion of faith. More specifically, they share many features such as circumcision, dietary regulations, and similar sexual codes. Further, because the Muslims were preeminent in the medieval centuries, "Jews themselves associated Jew with Muslim." When this became known among the Christians, it much harmed the Jews' position. Most damaging of all, Jews on occasion helped Muslim troops against Christians (as in the initial Arab conquest of Spain) and some Jews held prominent positions in Muslim governments at war with the Christians. Even when they did not actually take part in the fighting, "Jews usually rejoiced when Christian territory fell into Islamic hands." </b></blockquote>
<blockquote>
The Cutlers marshall a variety of textual and pictoral proof to make their case that medieval Christians saw a deep connection between Jew and Muslim. To take one of each: An influential twelfth-century Christian text includes the bizarre statement that "A Jew is not a Jew until he converts to Islam." The woodcut in a book of religious disputation published in 1508 pictures a Jewish and a Muslim figure: while the Jewish figure carries a banner with the name "Machometus" (Muhammad), the Muslim's banner depicts a Jew's hat. </blockquote>
<blockquote>
The Cutlers conclude:</blockquote>
<br />
<blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>Since the rise of Islam, the primary (though by no means the only) factors in the history of anti-Semitism have been the following: the association of Jew with Muslim, the longstanding European tendency to equate the Jew, of Middle Eastern origin, with the Muslim, also of Middle Eastern origin; the intensely held Christian feeling that the Jew was an ally of, and in league with, his ethnoreligious cousin the Muslim against the West; the deep-seated Christian apprehension that the Jew, the internal Semitic alien, was working hand in hand with the Muslim, the external Semitic enemy, to bring about the eventual destruction of Indo-European Christendom. </b></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Third, Christian fear of Muslims affected the view of Jews. In order to prove this thesis, the Cutlers must show that Christian anti-Semitism varied in response to Christian-Muslim relations. The status of Jews had to decline as Christian animosity toward Muslims increased; conversely, Jews had to be better off when wars against Muslims ceased. </blockquote>
<blockquote>
The authors do establish this point in a broad-brush sort of way, more by assertion than through a close look at the record. They argue that far fewer anti-Semitic outbreaks occurred in 700-1000, when Muslims were still a distant concern, than in 1000-1300, when they had become the victims of intense hostility. The Cutlers date the transition to about 1010, when rumors spread through France that the Jews had helped the Fatimid rulers of Egypt destroy the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. In retaliation, the Jews of Orleans were made to pay with their lives.</blockquote>
<a href="http://www.danielpipes.org/33/the-jew-as-ally-of-the-muslim-medieval-roots-of-anti" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.3s; color: #009eb8; display: inline; outline: none; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.3s;">Source</a><br />
<br />
As I have noted before, the Jews have constructed a narrative of "antisemitism" that is nothing but a preposterous fable. This narrative claims that antagonism to Jews either has no reason whatsoever and/or has ludicrous mythical or psychological explanations, such as the belief that Jews killed Jesus. In reality, antagonism to Jews is provoked by Jewish behaviour. My own present feelings towards Jews were provoked, first of all, by the sight of prominent Jews constantly pushing immigration, diversity, multiculturalism and pro-Islam sentiments while playing the Hitler card against anyone who disagreed; and, perhaps even more importantly, by the reaction of other Jews when these facts were pointed out, one of unreasoning hostility and an absolute inability to admit fault, exactly like Muslims when confronted with their iniquities, in other words. My present suspicion of Jews is rooted, not in fantasy, but in Jewish behaviour.<br />
<br />
Similarly, as this book makes clear, the hostility our ancestors felt towards Jews had a similar explanation: they were perceived as a fifth column of traitors collaborating with hostile Muslims threatening to overwhelm our civilisation. (And, as the book points out, and as I have pointed out, there were many instances where this collaboration did undoubtedly occur.) As Muslims largely ceased to be threatening to Europe after the 17th century, so hostility to Jews faded.<br />
<br />
Now Muslims are threatening Europe again. Again we see Jews playing the collaborative or facilitating role for their incursions into our lands. And, tragically, almost the entirety of the resistance movement to this invasion is in Jewish hands. Even the Counterjihadists in Europe who aren't themselves Jewish are so utterly under their thumb that they're afraid to say anything bad about them or even link to a site that does! Poor Europe.<br />
<br />
Note the authors of the book apparently end it with some bizarre political advice for the present day. They demand that, rather than end Jewish-Muslim collaboration, it should, in effect be intensified.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b>American and world Jewry should be ready and willing to put much more of its community-relations time, money, energy, and imagination into urging Christians and Muslims to enter into genuine dialogue and reconciliation.</b></span></blockquote>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">They also demand that the Pope should, in effect, stop being a Catholic and instead become a kind of rainbow figurehead for all.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b> [the Pope should] ...transform his office and mission from a more narrowly Christian into a broadly Abrahamic one . . . to create a new spiritual and institutional unity between Jews, Christians, and Muslims.</b></span></blockquote>
- </div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-47353647151057908752014-06-28T17:56:00.000+01:002014-06-28T17:56:47.342+01:00Jews conspired to destroy the White South African government and murder the Boer / Afrikaaner people.<div style="text-align: justify;">
In the 19th century the British fought wars to subject the Boer states to British Rule. In 1948, the Boers took power democratically, with the election of the National Party.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In the 1960s the government of Hendrik Verwoerd took power and implemented the formal separate but equal policies in South Africa. These policies made South Africa the economically strongest nation in Africa, and gave the blacks in South Africa (and the whites) the highest standards of living of any African nation.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Verwoerd's policies had two main opponents. One was a Jew named Harry Oppenheimer, the other a Jew named Anton Ruppert. Both controlled banking monopolies in the country, and wanted "rights" extended to black South Africans for the purpose of extending their money lending business. Oppenheimer had ties to the Rothschild banking family and to the US CIA, which throughout the 1970s through 1990s supported the overthrow of white South African rule, at the direction of the Jew Henry Kissinger.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Oppenheimer lobbied the Rothschilds to overthrow Verwoerd, who had publicly denounced the Jewish banking monopolies in Parliament. The Rothschilds secured the support of the Rockefeller, Carnegie and other "Anglo" families in the United States, and had those institutions lobby against the white government. Rockfeller influenced the Council on Foreign Relations and its members in the US government in particular to oppose white rule.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In 1963 a group of Jews founded the "African" National Congress. The ANC was founded by Lionel Bernstein, Bob Hepple, Dennis Goldberg, Arthur Goldreich, Hazel Goldreich and James Kantor, with a few African front men -- Nelson Mandela, Walter Sisulu, Govan Mbeki (father of Thabo Mbeki), Raymond Mhlaba, and Ahmed Kathrada. In this, the ANC followed the model the Jews established when they founded the NAACP in the United States, with the exception that the ANC was a much more violent and openly communist organization. These Jews and their African National Congress received funding and support from both the Soviet Union and the US CIA.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In particular, Ruth First, the Jewish wife of Jewish Soviet KGB Colonel Joe Slovo, a leader of the South African Communist Party, was primarily responsible for funneling funds to this "African" National Congress.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In 1966 the CIA financed the assassination of President Verwoerd, through their "lone nut" operative Demetrio Tsafendas, a Greek immigrant to South Africa. In particular, Oppenheimer's South African Foundation funneled CIA money to Hendrik Van Den Bergh of the South African Security Police and John Vorster, the Minister of Justice, who were the men who recruited Tsafendas to assassinate Verwoerd.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
By the 1970s the Jewish campaign to subvert South Africa was having no effect. The economy was unaffected by sanctions and communist unrest was minimal -- though much was made of it in the Jewish owned elements of the US press.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In 1978 the CIA recruited Pik Botha, the South African foreign minister, as a spy and used him to subvert the South African government, working with Samuel Huntington and Chester Crocker, Botha was assigned to undermine and alter the attitudes of the South African government regarding black rule.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Botha recruited Minister of Sports Piet Koornhof **and Head of Military Intelligence General Tienie Groenewald to the CIA-Jew operation. Groenewald in particular passed on the names of Afrikanner nationalist and white rights activists to MI6 and the CIA, and arranged for acts of violence and harassment, COINTELPRO style, against Boer activists in the country.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In the late 1970s and the early 1980s the banking families, Oppenheimer in particular, began to speculate in the Rand for the purpose of devaluing the currency. Inflation rose to 7 percent and growth fell to 3 percent, with inflation reaching 16 percent in the early 1980s.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In 1989 a Freemason with ties to B'nai B'rith, the Jewish Masonic fraternity which controls the ADL, was elected President of South Africa. Presient Frederik De Klerk was a Jewish-backed candidate with ties to the international Zionist establishment. De Klerk worked for, and eventually achieved, the Jewish goal of black rule in South Africa.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Today, South Africa's central bank is run by a Jew named Gill Marcus, with the black frontman named Tito Mboweni taking instructions. Trevor Manuel, a Jew, is the Minister of Finance. Alec Erwin, a Jew, is the Minister of Trade and Industry. Helena Dolny, the Jewish ex-wife of KGB Colonel Joe Slovo, runs the Land Bank. Ronnie Kasrils, a Jew, is the Minister of Water Affairs and Forestry. Louise Tager, a Jew, is chairman of the railway system, Spoornet. Michael Katz, a Jew,is the chief consultant on taxation. Meyer Kahn, a Jew, is the managing director of the police service. Three Jews -- Richard Goldstone, Arthur Chaskalson, and Albert Sachs -- sit on the South African Supreme Court</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
What has happened in South Africa under the name of "democracy" and "diversity" has been the Jewish takeover of their country. As with all Jewish governments, South Africa is now a failed nation. It is poor, it is crime ridden, and it is not safe to walk the streets.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The Jews wage war on anyone who opposes their total domination of the world's economy. They also work to make sure they control the governments of every single developed country in the world. Jews use whatever tools they can -- phony allegations of "racism" or pleas for "democracy", for instance -- to win stupid, thoughtless non-Jews to their cause, but all celebrated communist, socialist, "democratic" and/or anti-racist groups in the world are Jewish run and Jewish financed.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-VKOhc6sq--I/U67zYwTq4ZI/AAAAAAAABzU/KtHv2jcV7Go/s1600/Nelson_Mandela_Joe_Slovo.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-VKOhc6sq--I/U67zYwTq4ZI/AAAAAAAABzU/KtHv2jcV7Go/s1600/Nelson_Mandela_Joe_Slovo.png" height="207" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
Source: <a href="http://bit.ly/1nQMWa9">http://bit.ly/1nQMWa9</a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
* * * * * * *</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
One might say that the bankers use the jews to advance their own agenda, but saddly jews themselves (or the majority of them) pretty much allow this to happen. Either way, this is good information.</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-32193357292167073432014-06-22T15:24:00.000+01:002014-06-22T15:24:29.531+01:00Who Controls the Federal Reserve System? <div style="text-align: justify;">
The Federal Reserve System is divided into two parts: the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, located in Washington DC, and the Federal Reserve District Banks, located throughout the United States. Here is the official website of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors: </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-VjIgXBh3g-A/U6bm22LGlKI/AAAAAAAABpY/89osYi3fMps/s1600/Federal_Reserve_2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-VjIgXBh3g-A/U6bm22LGlKI/AAAAAAAABpY/89osYi3fMps/s1600/Federal_Reserve_2.jpg" height="178" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If you examine this page, you will see that there are five members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. You will also see that all five(5) of the board members are Jewish. This is a numerical representation of 100%. Why is this important? </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It’s important because Jews only constitute about 2% of the United States population*. So the odds that all five members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors would be Jewish are infinitesimally small. Here are the five members of the Federal Reserve </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>Board of Governors: </b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Benjamin S. Bernanke - Jewish </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Donald L. Kohn - Jewish </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Kevin M. Warsh - Jewish </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Randall S. Kroszner - Jewish </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Frederic S. Mishkin - Jewish </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Now, if you examine the presidents of the twelve Federal Reserve District Banks, you will discover a similar pattern of Jewish over-representation. Here is the section of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors’ website that lists the twelve Federal Reserve District Banks and their respective presidents: </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If you examine this section, you will see that there are twelve Federal Reserve Bank presidents. You will also see that nine(9) of the twelve presidents are Jewish. This is a numerical representation of 75%. Again, this is important because Jews only comprise about 2% of the United States population*, so the chances that nine of the twelve Federal Reserve Bank presidents would be Jewish are incredibly miniscule. Here are the twelve presidents of the Federal Reserve District Banks: </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
FRB of Boston: Eric S. Rosengren - Jewish </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
FRB of New York: Timothy F. Geithner - Jewish </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
FRB of Philadelphia: Charles I. Plosser - Jewish </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
FRB of Richmond: Jeffrey M. Lacker - Jewish </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
FRB of St. Louis: James B. Bullard - Jewish </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
FRB of Minneapolis: Gary H. Stern - Jewish </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
FRB of Kansas City: Thomas M. Hoenig - Jewish </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
FRB of Dallas: Richard W. Fisher - Jewish </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
FRB of San Francisco: Janet L. Yellen - Jewish </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
FRB of Cleveland: Sandra Pianalto - gentile </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
FRB of Atlanta: Dennis P. Lockhart - gentile </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
FRB of Chicago: Charles L. Evans - gentile </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This extreme numerical over-representation of Jews among the members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Federal Reserve District Bank presidents cannot be explained away as a coincidence or as the result of mere random chance. You must ask yourself how such an incredibly small and extremely unrepresentative minority ethnic group that only represents about 2% of the American population could so completely dominate the highest levels of the United States Federal Reserve System?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Source: <a href="http://prince.org/msg/105/271100">http://prince.org/msg/105/271100</a></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-6473837660618918862014-06-08T21:26:00.000+01:002014-06-08T21:26:00.353+01:00Racism<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.blogger.com/video.g?token=AD6v5dxChwXszZdQbcU4xYTLbYhm00NNNHUSwe0XnvJxho1cvGmn-ibcO8RFL4ZhyUJbvyM3TJK5bK9tlxDEErz1cg' class='b-hbp-video b-uploaded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01629699587180617271noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-8224133996979295032014-06-06T18:34:00.003+01:002014-06-06T18:34:24.448+01:00Isaiah 53: What Did the Rabbis Say?<a href="http://www.chaim.org/rabbis.htm">Source</a><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>Maybe you weren't told, but many ancient rabbinic sources understood Isaiah 53 as referring to the Messiah. Here are quotations from some of them: </b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>Babylonian Talmud</b>: "The Messiah --what is his name?...The Rabbis say, The Leper Scholar, as it is said, `<i>surely he has borne our griefs and carried our sorrows: </i>yet we did esteem him a leper, <i>smitten of God and afflicted</i>...'" (Sanhedrin 98b) </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>Midrash Ruth Rabbah</b>: "Another explanation (of Ruth ii.14): -- He is speaking of king Messiah; `Come hither,' draw near to the throne; `and eat of the bread,' that is, the bread of the kingdom; `and dip thy morsel in the vinegar,' this refers to his chastisements, as it is said, <i>`But he was wounded for our transgressions, bruised for our iniquities</i>'"</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>Targum Jonathan</b>: "<i>Behold my servant</i> Messiah<i> shall prosper; he shall be high and increase and be exceedingly strong...</i>"</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>Zohar</b>: "`<i>He was wounded for our transgressions</i>,' etc....There is in the Garden of Eden a palace called the Palace of the Sons of Sickness; this palace the Messiah then enters, and summons every sickness, every pain, and every chastisement of Israel; they all come and rest upon him. And were it not that he had thus lightened them off Israel and taken them upon himself, there had been no man able to bear Israel's chastisements for the transgression of the law: and this is that which is written, <i>`Surely our sicknesses he hath carried.</i>'" </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-5Y-6GmX3PVY/U5H7ffAR-zI/AAAAAAAABhE/SyCzFVM4g4I/s1600/Rabbi_Messiah.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-5Y-6GmX3PVY/U5H7ffAR-zI/AAAAAAAABhE/SyCzFVM4g4I/s1600/Rabbi_Messiah.jpg" height="200" width="200" /></a></div>
<b>Rabbi Moses Maimonides</b>: "What is the manner of Messiah's advent....there shall rise up one of whom none have known before, and signs and wonders which they shall see performed by him will be the proofs of his true origin; for the Almighty, where he declares to us his mind upon this matter, says, `Behold a man whose name is the Branch, and he shall branch forth out of his place' (Zech. 6:12). And Isaiah speaks similarly of the time when he shall appear, without father or mother or family being known, <i>He came up as a sucker before him, and as a root out of dry earth, etc.</i>...in the words of Isaiah, when describing the manner in which kings will harken to him, <i>At him kings will shut their mouth; for that which had not been told them have they seen, and that which they had not heard they have perceived." </i>(From the Letter to the South (Yemen), quoted in<u>The Fifty-third Chapter of Isaiah According to the Jewish Interpreters</u>, Ktav Publishing House, 1969, Volume 2, pages 374-5)</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>Rabbi Mosheh Kohen Ibn Crispin</b>: This rabbi described those who interpret Isaiah 53 as referring to Israel as those: "having forsaken the knowledge of our Teachers, and inclined after the `stubbornness of their own hearts,' and of their own opinion, I am pleased to interpret it, in accordance with the teaching of our Rabbis, of the King Messiah....This prophecy was delivered by Isaiah at the divine command for the purpose of making known to us something about the nature of the future Messiah, who is to come and deliver Israel, and his life from the day when he arrives at discretion until his advent as a redeemer, in order that if anyone should arise claiming to be himself the Messiah, we may reflect, and look to see whether we can observe in him any resemblance to the traits described here; if there is any such resemblance, then we may believe that he is the Messiah our righteousness; but if not, we cannot do so."<br />
<br />
<i> (From his commentary on Isaiah, quoted in <u>The Fifty-third Chapter of Isaiah According to the Jewish Interpreters</u>, Ktav Publishing House, 1969, Volume 2, pages 99-114.)</i></div>
<hr style="text-align: justify;" />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Many more rabbinic citations can be found in books listed in the <a href="http://www.chaim.org/further.htm"><strong>resource link.</strong></a></div>
<hr style="text-align: justify;" />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://www.chaim.org/nation.htm"><strong><u>To see why Isaiah 53 cannot refer to Israel, and who it must be, click here.</u></strong></a><strong><u><br /></u></strong></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://www.chaim.org/leper.htm"><strong><u>To learn about the curious idea of the Leper-Messiah click here.</u></strong></a><strong><u><br /></u></strong></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://www.chaim.org/2messiah.htm"><strong><u>To learn about the "Two-Messiah" theory of some rabbinic thinkers click here.</u></strong></a><strong><u><br /></u></strong></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://www.chaim.org/further.htm"><strong><u>To see a list of resources for further study click here.</u></strong></a></div>
<h4 style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://www.chaim.org/servant.htm">To learn about how you can develop a relationship with the Suffering Servant</a><u>.</u></h4>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://www.chaim.org/isaiah53.htm"><strong><u>To go back to the Suffering Servant (Isaiah 53) page click here</u></strong></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://www.chaim.org/index.htm"><strong><u>To return to the CHAIM home page click here.</u></strong></a></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-72929076685412731222014-05-31T21:26:00.000+01:002014-05-31T21:26:00.095+01:00Edward Snowden<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.blogger.com/video.g?token=AD6v5dwr03bswVLd62-d_hLmg8i7NiSTW_w8iFwWo7cqok-OckcX6ksLfS230bSqXS8LkOQ4ERlpJVppQi3x4QedlA' class='b-hbp-video b-uploaded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01629699587180617271noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-39552652150145791572014-05-06T00:01:00.000+01:002014-05-06T00:01:58.949+01:00Boko Haram: "I Will Sell Your Daughters"<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.blogger.com/video.g?token=AD6v5dw0FQ7r_k_Fm8ZZTvGEjM2azFH4SygXJiQmBZAUG5lhl9DwG6SQjW0HTkKmptAfAtoao3XTBspyulU2Dcri' class='b-hbp-video b-uploaded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<br />Lucashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17529021789568484898noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-69770270303995731652014-04-30T08:40:00.001+01:002014-04-30T08:40:34.150+01:00Ex-Scoutmaster Sentenced to 30 Years in Prison for Homosexual Child Abuse<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://bit.ly/1hTOfkh">Source</a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-vWCeEUJk6js/U2CoyUlFaCI/AAAAAAAABCk/P7y3jn2SXuc/s1600/Homossexual_Pedofilo.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-vWCeEUJk6js/U2CoyUlFaCI/AAAAAAAABCk/P7y3jn2SXuc/s1600/Homossexual_Pedofilo.png" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
An ex-scoutmaster has been sentenced to 30 years behind bars after pleading guilty to sexually abusing three boys while serving as a Keswick Boy Scout troop leader.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
David Brian Watkins, 50, accepted a plea deal earlier this year after originally being indicted on 70 charges surrounding inappropriate contact with scouts. He plead guilty to 36 counts in January, avoiding a jury trial, which could have resulted in multiple life sentences.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Watkins, who led Keswick Troop 1028 from 2002 to 2008, admitted to abusing male scouts from 2006-2009. He was arrested in November 2012 after a scout, who was 13 at the time of the incident and is now an adult, reported him to the police.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
On Thursday, Judge Cheryl Higgins sentenced Watkins to ten years in prison for each of three counts of carnal knowledge of a child between the ages of 13 and 15. She suspended the remaining 33 charges, which would have placed him behind bars for another 165 years.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Prior to his sentencing, Watkins asked the court for mercy, but prosecutor Darby Lowe read segments of a report to the court where Watkins had told police that it was instead the boy who initiated the sexual contact. According to the Charlottesville Daily Progress, Watkins stated that it was he who felt that he had been raped.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Watkins’ defense attorney Andre Hakes also told that court that the boys involved consented to having sexual activity with the Scoutmaster.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
“These were continuing sexual relationships, and though they were with children under 18, they were consensual,” she stated. “David Watkins is not just these crimes. He is responsible for them, but they are not all of who he was.”</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Before issuing her sentence, Higgins expressed a concern that Watkins and his defense failed to have contrition over his behavior.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
“What is especially concerning to the court in this case is the lack of acknowledgement by the defendant,”she stated.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Following his arrest two years ago, a Portland attorney who won a lawsuit in 2010 lodged by a former Boy Scout who claimed that he was molested by an assistant scout leader told reporters that Watkin’s case reinforces her concerns about the organization.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
“This says two things about Boy Scouts,” attorney Kelly Clark said. “First, there is a serious problem with child abuse in Scouting. Second, a lot of organizations [like Boy Scouts] put their own interests ahead of the interests of the kids.”</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
As previously reported, thousands of documents were released in October 2012 outlining evidence of longstanding and widespread sexual abuse in the Boy Scouts of America. The documents, which the Boy Scouts had fought to keep secret, contained information collected since shortly after its inception in 1910, including letters from victims and their parents, as well as memos and handwritten notes. Some allegations had been substantiated, while others were yet undetermined.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In all, there were 14,500 pages of evidence released.</div>
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01629699587180617271noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-56323560108388893562014-04-12T05:20:00.000+01:002014-04-12T05:20:00.304+01:00They tried to kill him<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.blogger.com/video.g?token=AD6v5dwyTnhJ48KI7cHKRePwLZD9dbkbrs67UL-5EbW-_bSYCTMKqKrgOQVBB2CejuoVRA6Kg7kYCiei4PEEmdu2xQ' class='b-hbp-video b-uploaded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.blogger.com/video.g?token=AD6v5dw_h598zTYZZS2DP02qkEc8ZasnSdgJnfMS-Kox4s679zUW1lGLGH-PED8aM480o_XjXh6UscuCzZpPjtEgpA' class='b-hbp-video b-uploaded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<br />Lucashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17529021789568484898noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-13713220462138146722014-04-08T09:46:00.000+01:002014-04-08T09:46:17.041+01:00Gay Conversion: I Slept With Over 200 Men, Now I'm a Happily Married Heterosexual Dad <div style="text-align: justify;">
I guess I became straight by accident. It was never a grand plan; the therapy was an attempt to resolve commitment issues, rather than sexual identity. I never had any desire to change my sexuality. But that's what happened – in fact I changed everything.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Having had hundreds of homosexual partners, I eventually married a woman and had a child. And my whole outlook on life changed. I grew from a loud and arrogant person, trying desperately to mask my deep insecurities in group situations, into a strong, assertive guy who loved sports and war films. At the age of 46, I've never felt better in my own skin.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But before we get into the details of my conversion, let's go back to the beginning.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I knew I was gay at about 10 or 11. My cousin himself had come out and I realised my own attractions were the same. At the age of 10 or 11 boys start getting interested in girls, but I was only interested in boys. I was definitely a number six on the Kinsey Scale – an exclusively homosexual male with no heterosexual desires whatsoever.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Teenage years were hell. I often thought of suicide, occasionally self-harmed and had a growing problem with alcohol and gay porn. I came out to my parents when I was 17, in floods of tears. But mum and dad were amazing; they said they had known I was gay and then affirmed their unconditional love for me. My mates at school also told me they had known for some time and supported me. The 'coming out' process wasn't tortuous or traumatic.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
At 18 I moved to London from the north of England and fully embraced my gay identity. I became the first person to live openly as a gay man in the section of the university I attended, and even established an LGBT group for other students, actively preaching against those who suggested that being gay was somehow a choice, or even wrong.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I never felt the need to change. I was born gay, it was all I'd ever known – end of. Even though I'd been raised a Christian and attended an LGBT Christian Movement in London, I reveled in the capital's gay scene and led a very promiscuous lifestyle. In fact, I reckon I had 200 sexual partners.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Eventually I settled down with a long-term boyfriend, an ex-soldier and Falklands vet, and we considered going abroad to marry – or at least have a civil-partnership. But around this time I made the decision to enter a relationship with Christ, which allowed me to examine my life more deeply.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I realised I had some issues, centring on commitment. I discovered I had a deep-rooted fear of rejection, I was too anxious, and I used people. I had an innate fear of men – not of their homophobia, but the real thing: a chasm between me and the normal heterosexual male (Kinsey's so-called number ones).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I terminated my relationship with my long-term partner to get a clean slate, and, acting on a friend's advice, I went into therapy to address my commitment issues. There was nothing brutal or harrowing about the help I received; the horror stories you hear from some of those gay-straight 'conversion' documentaries don't apply here. It was simply a mixture of cognitive therapy, to challenge my core beliefs and root out one-sided thinking; behavioural therapy, to change problematic actions trained through years of reinforcement; and EMDR, which uses rhythmic eye movements to dampen the power of traumatic memories.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
My therapist and I never focused solely on my being sexually attracted to men, but my "being gay" had to be part of the dialogue, otherwise I'd have been leaving a part of my life at the door. Much of my journey was about forgiving those I needed to forgive, and recognising where I had built walls against significant others in my life, especially my parents and siblings.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I eventually came to realise that as a boy I had failed to interact with other men on any significant level. I had perceived myself to be rejected by men even as a small boy and had made an inner vow never to deeply trust them. People had reached out to me and I had spurned them, including my father and two older brothers. No wonder men had become a mystery to me and even an obsession by my teens, when I began erotically craving men and feeding this through porn.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I also realised I had thrown myself wholeheartedly into a world of the feminine, with no masculine counter-balance, yet I despised women for having the natural ability to woo every aspect of a heterosexual man, which I could not do. I discovered that my natural place was not among women.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A lot of core behaviours were challenged - my looks, my body, my walk – and my therapist challenged me to look at where I wasn't like other men, and where I was. The therapist began to work on things like my voice and my gait - he was giving me permission to think in a different way, to do things differently.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Feeling of acceptance</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
My fears and anxiety gradually subsided, and I began to feel more accepted around both men and women. I moved from constantly rejecting masculine identity to embracing it; my posture changed, I began to walk straighter and lost my old mincing walk. My voice gained a whole new resonance, such that people would regularly comment on it to me.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I began to see that maybe, just maybe, I was never truly gay and that there was a man as real and as noble as the men I had often admired, worshipped and yearned for hidden deep within me, waiting to be freed and released.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Physical contact with women, even touching a woman's hair, became more enjoyable. I began to enjoy being a man, and enjoy women's company more. This doesn't mean I went out and was attracted to every woman I met; I wasn't an on-heat teenager. But it was a gradual process, eventually leading to dates and relationships.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Today I've been married to a woman for eight years, and we have a five-year-old daughter. I love art and theatre, but I enjoy team sports in a way that frightened me as a child. One of my favourite movies is Saving Private Ryan, because it's about brotherhood and deep male friendships, something I'd never enjoyed before.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Am I now exclusively heterosexual, some people ask? Most of the time, yes. But for most people there are periods where sexuality can be quite fluid. At times this is true for me too. I don't miss the gay lifestyle I left behind –when I visited my ex-boyfriend, five years after therapy, it brought to home to me the drawbacks of that life. His voice had become camp and weak, and he had even contracted HIV.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I know more than ever that my decision to entertain therapy, and at a later stage the therapy which concentrates on repairing malformed sexual orientation, saved my life in the long run. It also saved a lot of taxpayers' money too. I now believe I would have ended up considering, and no doubt requesting, gender reassignment at the expense of the public purse.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But the changes in my life (and my ex-boyfriend's) don't make me want to preach or convert anyone. Therapy can be dangerous, and there's no reason why anyone should feel compelled to 'convert'.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But I now believe people aren't born gay, and anyone can develop the sort of hidden identity I've found.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Source: <a href="http://bit.ly/PXt0r7d">http://bit.ly/PXt0r7d</a></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-29864831759636379662014-03-20T13:16:00.000+00:002014-03-20T13:16:31.252+00:00Homosexual Hijackers: The Hypersexualization of Cultural Hostages<div style="text-align: justify;">
When the celebration of a godly Catholic Saint becomes a flashpoint for the homosexual agenda, it’s just another sure sign that things have really spiraled out of control in America. How is it that the St. Patrick’s Day parades in Boston and New York have become the latest pawn in the homosexual hijacking of this country?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In the current cultural clash between morality and decadence, apparently nothing is considered sacred or beyond the tainting touch of the “gay lobby.”</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-T05shgIghI0/UyrqI8hBlDI/AAAAAAAAAJ4/bJe6KI4YmWE/s1600/Bash_Back.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-T05shgIghI0/UyrqI8hBlDI/AAAAAAAAAJ4/bJe6KI4YmWE/s1600/Bash_Back.jpg" height="166" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
As the militant homosexual activists aggressively sweep through our society in their hostage-taking enterprise, they trample on religious rights — and numerous other freedoms — leaving only debauchery in their wake. Through their shameless “gay” gangland style thuggery, they defile and hypersexualize everything that they come into contact with. And the “Big Beer” brouhaha is just their latest attempt to distort a holiday observance, which is supposed to be about commemorating a heroic, holy man, into more perversity on parade. The homosexual wrecking ball has “come out” in full vengeance mode with corporate sponsors, professional sports organizations, elected officials, mainstream media outlets, Hollywood celebrities, and universities all drooling and panting to be the first to ride the “gay” bandwagon on its path to perdition. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Is it any wonder that the Catholic Church doesn’t want to sully their Saint with the raunchy displays that are typically seen in the annual “gay pride” parades held across America? Why would the organizers want to see homosexuals prancing around in drag, genitalia-revealing clothing, or nearly naked?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And what’s the likelihood that “gay pride” organizers would ever allow Christians to march in their parades and pass out biblical literature about the sinfulness of homosexuality? Or what’s the chance that they would welcome groups such as NOM (National Organization for Marriage), NARTH (National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality) or JONAH (Jews Offering New Alternatives to Homosexuality) to march right alongside the transvestites? Or what about an ex-gay marching band or Mark Regnerus as the grand marshal? Not on your life! The simple fact is that homosexual events are not “open” to everyone. Certain individuals and organizations, that don’t conform to their ideology, are absolutely barred from participating in their parades. Of course, they wouldn’t want any religious or moral principles “raining on their parade.” Homosexual extremists march along a one-way street when it comes to so-called “tolerance.”</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
At “gay pride” events and parades in places such as San Francisco, Atlanta, Charlotte, and New Orleans, it is not uncommon to see drag queens, phalluses, public nudity, actual and simulated sex acts, offensive signs/music, pornographic images, NAMBLA (pedophilia) representatives, S&M paraphernalia, and public spankings to raise money for AIDS efforts. So, why would the Catholic Church – and any morally sane individual – want to associate St. Patrick with those kinds of debauched displays?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In some places, the homosexual hijackers’ reign of terror is basically complete. For instance, in San Francisco, public decency ordinances are consistently and systematically overlooked during their homosexual, perversity-promoting events. Nudity and public sex acts are the norm during the annual Folsom Street Fair and other “gay pride” parades and festivals held in the city. Police officers, on foot and bicycle, congregate nearby and observe, making no attempt to enforce the law for fear of being labeled homophobic or worse.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And where is the mainstream media while all of this crude and vulgar behavior is so blatantly on display? They’re engaged in a homosexual-friendly, collaborative cover-up via a media blackout because they know that these sex-crazed, pornified sin-fests don’t fit the nice, neat little narrative of the happy, “normal gay family” that’s just minding their own business in relative suburban obscurity. Although not all homosexuals are militantly involved in the hostile takeover of the American culture, we can’t ignore the intimidating and morally corrosive efforts of the aggressive “gay” activists.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In advance of the September 15, 2013 “gay pride” parade in Dallas, Texas, the city officials made it clear that they had had enough of this type of outrageous behavior. They pledged to crack down on the lewdness and nudity that had become widespread at their annual gay pride parade. While past marches had featured bare-breasted women and men in tight, wet underwear with visible genitalia, Dallas law enforcement said the city would no longer turn a blind eye to such violations of city and state law. The rules now state: “In accordance with the city of Dallas public nudity ordinance, parade participants must not expose genitalia, buttocks, or female breasts.” Additionally, the new parade restrictions prohibit other vile exhibitions: “In accordance with state of Texas obscenity law, sexual paraphernalia, real or simulated sex acts and genital or phallic representations are prohibited from the parade.” City officials, along with the event’s organizers, said they wanted the pride event to be more “family friendly.”</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The reaction, however, from the “gay” community and activists to this policy change was quite eye-opening. It shockingly revealed the true darkness that lurks at the heart of America’s homosexual movement. They expressed great outraged at the newly-implemented common sense changes. On the social media website Twitter, incensed homosexuals vowed to wear – or not wear – whatever they wanted to the pride parade. Activist Daniel Cates wrote on his Facebook page, “The ‘queer’ is effectively being erased from our Pride celebration in favor of the most polished, heteronormative representation of our community as possible. It should be noted that the rioters at the Stonewall Inn fought to break OUT of the d*mn closet! Our movement was built of sex positivity and our desire to BE WHO WE ARE! I urge you ALL to openly DEFY the Tavern Guild!” (Evidently, the word “restraint” is nowhere to be found in the homosexual dictionary.)</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Based on Mr. Cates’ own words, here are a just a few thoughts:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If they “can’t be themselves” without being mostly naked, raunchy, and highly sexualized, doesn’t that contradict the whole “It’s not about sex, it’s about love” mantra? It sounds much more to me like a crotch-centric fixation than anything to do with love. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If they’re so adamantly against “heteronormative” behavior, then why are homosexual activists also fighting so hard to get “married?” Marriage, after all, is the most heteronormative institution there is! There is obviously no method to their madness.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And homosexuals claim that they want equal treatment under the law, but as soon as they are told that they will be treated like any other citizen who breaks public decency laws, they throw a hissy fit. Apparently, they don’t really want equal treatment; what they demand is special treatment. They think that they are entitled to some sort of “protected class,” above-the-law status that allows them to brazenly break the law with impunity, and sadly, in most places and in many ways, that’s exactly what were witnessing as public officials cower in fear and cave to their every terrorist-like tactic!</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Therefore, the “coexist” meme is a falsehood of epic proportions; it’s really “Leftist code” for the legal authorization of the anti-Christian forces – of which the virulent homosexual hijackers have become the worst offenders – to run roughshod over anyone with whom they disagree. In their twisted idea of coexistence, Christians and conservatives must live under the heel of the homofascists.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
What the St. Patrick’s Day Parade organizers and every other religious group, cultural edifice or icon of morality need to do is implement a “we don’t negotiate with ‘queer’ terrorists” policy. Or else all will be lost to the homosexual hijackers.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Source: <a href="http://bit.ly/1ozcBWe">http://bit.ly/1ozcBWe</a></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-75599269185485349952014-03-18T09:15:00.000+00:002014-03-18T09:15:18.419+00:00Love Isn’t Enough: 5 Reasons Why Same-Sex Marriage Will Harm Children<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://www.drtraycehansen.com/Pages/writings_samesex.html">By Trayce Hansen, Ph.D.</a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Proponents of same-sex marriage believe the only thing children really need is love. Based on that supposition, they conclude it’s just as good for children to be raised by loving parents of the same sex, as it is to be raised by loving parents of the opposite sex. Unfortunately, that basic assumption—and all that flows from it—is false. Because love isn’t enough!</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
All else being equal, children do best when raised by a married mother and father. It’s within this environment that children are most likely to be exposed to the emotional and psychological experiences they need in order to thrive.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Men and women bring diversity to parenting; each makes unique contributions to the rearing of children that can’t be replicated by the other. Mothers and fathers simply are not interchangeable. Two women can both be good mothers, but neither can be a good father.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So here are five reasons why it’s in the best interest of children to be raised by both a mother and a father:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
First, mother-love and father-love—though equally important—are qualitatively different and produce distinct parent-child attachments. Specifically, it’s the combination of the unconditional-leaning love of a mother and the conditional-leaning love of a father that’s essential to a child’s development. Either of these forms of love without the other can be problematic. Because what a child needs is the complementary balance the two types of parental love and attachment provide.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Only heterosexual parents offer children the opportunity to develop relationships with a parent of the same, as well as the opposite sex. Relationships with both sexes early in life make it easier for a child to relate to both sexes later in life. For a girl, that means she’ll better understand and appropriately interact with the world of men and be more comfortable in the world of women. And for a boy, the converse will hold true. Having a relationship with “the other”—an opposite sexed parent—also increases the likelihood that a child will be more empathetic and less narcissistic.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Secondly, children progress through predictable and necessary developmental stages. Some stages require more from a mother, while others require more from a father. For example, during infancy, babies of both sexes tend to do better in the care of their mother. Mothers are more attuned to the subtle needs of their infants and thus are more appropriately responsive. However, at some point, if a young boy is to become a competent man, he must detach from his mother and instead identify with his father. A fatherless boy doesn’t have a man with whom to identify and is more likely to have trouble forming a healthy masculine identity.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A father teaches a boy how to properly channel his aggressive and sexual drives. A mother can’t show a son how to control his impulses because she’s not a man and doesn’t have the same urges as one. A father also commands a form of respect from a boy that a mother doesn’t––a respect more likely to keep the boy in line. And those are the two primary reasons why boys without fathers are more likely to become delinquent and end up incarcerated.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Father-need is also built into the psyche of girls. There are times in a girl’s life when only a father will do. For instance, a father offers a daughter a safe, non-sexual place to experience her first male-female relationship and have her femininity affirmed. When a girl doesn’t have a father to fill that role she’s more likely to become promiscuous in a misguided attempt to satisfy her inborn hunger for male attention and validation.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Overall, fathers play a restraining role in the lives of their children. They restrain sons from acting out antisocially, and daughters from acting out sexually. When there’s no father to perform this function, dire consequences often result both for the fatherless children and for the society in which these children act out their losses.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Third, boys and girls need an opposite-sexed parent to help them moderate their own gender-linked inclinations. As example, boys generally embrace reason over emotion, rules over relationships, risk-taking over caution, and standards over compassion, while girls generally embrace the reverse. An opposite-sexed parent helps a child keep his or her own natural proclivities in check by teaching—verbally and nonverbally—the worth of the opposing tendencies. That teaching not only facilitates moderation, but it also expands the child’s world—helping the child see beyond his or her own limited vantage point.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Fourth, same-sex marriage will increase sexual confusion and sexual experimentation by young people. The implicit and explicit message of same-sex marriage is that all choices are equally acceptable and desirable. So, even children from traditional homes—influenced by the all-sexual-options-are-equal message—will grow up thinking it doesn’t matter whom one relates to sexually or marries. Holding such a belief will lead some—if not many—impressionable young people to consider sexual and marital arrangements they never would have contemplated previously. And children from homosexual families, who are already more likely to experiment sexually, would do so to an even greater extent, because not only was non-traditional sexuality role-modeled by their parents, it was also approved by their society.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
There is no question that human sexuality is pliant. Think of ancient Greece or Rome—among many other early civilizations—where male homosexuality and bisexuality were nearly ubiquitous. This was not so because most of those men were born with a “gay gene,” rather it was because homosexuality was condoned by those societies. That which a society sanctions, it gets more of.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And fifth, if society permits same-sex marriage, it also will have to allow other types of marriage. The legal logic is simple: If prohibiting same-sex marriage is discriminatory, then disallowing polygamous marriage, polyamorous marriage, or any other marital grouping will also be deemed discriminatory. The emotional and psychological ramifications of these assorted arrangements on the developing psyches and sexuality of children would be disastrous. And what happens to the children of these alternative marriages if the union dissolves and each parent then “remarries”? Those children could end up with four fathers, or two fathers and four mothers, or, you fill in the blank.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Certainly homosexual couples can be just as loving as heterosexual couples, but children require more than love. They need the distinctive qualities and the complementary natures of a male and female parent.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The accumulated wisdom of over 5,000 years has concluded that the ideal marital and parental configuration is composed of one man and one woman. Arrogantly disregarding such time-tested wisdom, and using children as guinea pigs in a radical experiment, is risky at best, and cataclysmic at worst.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Same-sex marriage definitely isn’t in the best interest of children. And although we empathize with those homosexuals who long to be married and parent children, we mustn’t allow our compassion for them to trump our compassion for children. In a contest between the desires of some homosexuals and the needs of all children, we can’t allow the children to lose.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
###</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
©2009 Dr. Trayce Hansen. All rights reserved.</div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-T6T_S5q2GOQ/UygOFyPCOZI/AAAAAAAAAJA/pacq3YJgW98/s1600/Adoption_Raised+By+Lesbians.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-T6T_S5q2GOQ/UygOFyPCOZI/AAAAAAAAAJA/pacq3YJgW98/s1600/Adoption_Raised+By+Lesbians.jpg" height="400" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-86932668942988844292014-03-15T16:37:00.000+00:002014-03-15T16:37:11.641+00:00Drag Queens in the Military<div style="text-align: justify;">
Since the repeal of the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy, U.S. military bases have hosted a gay marriage ceremonies and a potluck gatherings. But on Saturday, servicemembers here may have been the first to take to the stage and perform as drag queens on a military installation in support of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender troops.<br /><br />Drag queens and drag kings, to be precise.<br /><br />Six servicemembers — gay, lesbian and straight — donned heavy makeup to dance and lip sync songs such as “I Wanna Dance with Somebody” for a raucous capacity crowd at the Rocker NCO Club at Kadena Air Base. The event was a fundraiser for the recently formed Okinawa chapter of OutServe-SLDN, which is the largest nonprofit advocate for the military’s LGBT community.<br /><br />“We didn’t think there was much of a desire for an event like this on the island but it has actually blown up,” said Navy Lt. Marissa Greene, co-chapter leader of OutServe Okinawa.<br /><br />Greene said she had hoped to sell about 75 tickets to fund some future support activities for the group, which was formed last summer and still “starting from scratch.” The event was approved as a “variety show” by Kadena’s 18th Wing through the same process as other on-base fundraisers.<br /><br />But an initial 200 tickets were plucked up almost immediately, so they issued another 200.<br /><br />“We ended up selling 400 tickets in 10 days,” she said.<br /><br />Amid the unexpected success, OutServe carefully avoided any mention of politics, but its variety show comes at a pivotal time for gay civil rights in the United States, with many states passing laws dealing with marriage or debating individual liberties.<br /><br />It is also a sign of the times within the military; just a few years ago, gay and lesbian drag performances on a military base would have been unthinkable and potentially a cause for dismissal from the service.<br /><br />The repeals of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, as well as the Defense of Marriage Act — the law barring the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages — have allowed gays and lesbians in the military to be open with their sexuality for the first time.<br /><br />The historic shift appears to be mostly accepted and embraced throughout the ranks despite warnings the DADT repeal could harm order and good discipline.<br /><br />On Saturday night, the Rocker club was packed for performances by servicemembers using stage names such as Chocolate Sunrise – a crowd favorite — and Artemis Faux. The event’s sole lesbian performer took the drag king name Manny Nuff.<br /><br />The advocacy group agreed to avoid using the term “drag show” as part of its on-base fundraiser effort.<br /><br />Tech. Sgt. Kristen Baker, who was among the crowd, said the show got a warm reception and would leave a mark for civil rights.<br /><br />“Everything is just accepted. It makes me really proud to watch it,” Baker said. In the military, “we are all brothers and sisters no matter what.”</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://www.stripes.com/news/gay-lesbian-troops-perform-in-drag-at-kadena-air-base-fundraiser-1.270747#.UxSHUy3_TeQ.facebook">Fonte</a><br /></div>
Lucashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17529021789568484898noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-25965206987133054542014-03-06T10:11:00.000+00:002014-03-06T10:11:23.994+00:00British Jewry Tried To Stop Zionism<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-RHHYOU58_i8/UxhJo5oOuLI/AAAAAAAAALs/96PqNf63nN0/s1600/Edwin_Montagu.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-RHHYOU58_i8/UxhJo5oOuLI/AAAAAAAAALs/96PqNf63nN0/s1600/Edwin_Montagu.jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
When the British Cabinet issued the Balfour Declaration in 1917, it was over the strenuous objections of its only Jewish member, Edwin Montagu. But non-Jews, including many anti-Semites, tipped the scales. They saw Zionism as a way to advance British imperialism and the Masonic “New World Order.”Montagu, who was the Secretary of State for India, told Prime Minister Lloyd George. “All my life I have been trying to get out of the ghetto. You want to force me back there.”</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
An assimilated Jew, Montagu regarded Judaism as only a religion, and viewed Zionism as a “mischievous political creed, untenable by any patriotic citizen of the United Kingdom.”</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
His story suggests that the New World Order is an elite conspiracy led by specific members of certain Jewish and non-Jewish dynastic families who often intermarried. It is not “Jewish” in terms of the Jewish people as a whole, who historically prefer assimilation.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In May 1917, a committee representing the leading Jewish organizations published a statement in the “London Times” saying: “Emancipated Jews… have no separate political aspirations…the establishment of a Jewish nationality in Palestine founded on [the] theory of a Jewish homelessness, must have the effect of stamping the Jews as strangers in their native lands.” (“Cousinhood”, p.260)</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The Balfour Declaration promised Jews a “national home” in Palestine. Partly, it was payment to Zionists for getting the USA into WWI on Britain’s side. Zionist president Chaim Weismann fumed that Jewish opposition was the main stumbling block to consummating the deal.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The Jewish community was split. The Samuels and the Rothschilds favored the Balfour Declaration; Cohen, Magnus, Mountefiore and Montagu were against it.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
“If it had been merely an issue between Zionist and non-Zionist factions within the community, there is little question that the latter would have won,” writes Chaim Bermant in “The Cousinhood.” “But there were the gentile Zionists to consider and they carried the day.” (262)</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
These gentiles included Arthur Balfour, Lord Milner, Lord Lothian (Phillip Kerr) and Lord Robert Cecil. Chaim Weismann recognized that Zionism is part of a much larger game: “To [Cecil], the re-establishment of a Jewish Homeland in Palestine and the organization of the world in a great federation were complementary features in the next step in the management of human affairs…” (Reed, “Controversy of Zion,” p. 249.)</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Georgetown University professor Caroll Quigley lists about 100 participants in the world government conspiracy in the Appendix of “The Anglo American Establishment” (1981). They include the above names and Cecil Rhodes, Lionel Curtis, William T. Stead, Geoffrey Dawson and Earl Grey. I recognized only three Jews: Nathan Rothschild, Leopold Amery and Alfred Beit.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Quigley relates how a group of aristocratic families centered on the Cecils has dominated British politics for centuries. They spawned the secret society organized by Cecil Rhodes and Nathan Rothschild in 1891, which Rhodes called “a church for the extension of the British Empire.” (34) Known as “The Round Table” and the “Milner group,” its goal was world domination by the British elite and the re-colonization of the US.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The “church” was Freemasonry. The politicians that backed Zionism were all high-ranking Masons. Some were probably Illuminati. “World government” is dedicated to enthroning Lucifer as God of this world. Zionism and Communism are Masonic organizations dedicated to this agenda.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A HERO FOR ASSIMILATED JEWS</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Edwin Montagu, the second son of the silver bullion dealer Samuel Montagu, was caught between his father’s Orthodox Judaism and desire to be an Englishman. He rejected Judaism but was not about to abandon his Jewish identity. “I will always be a good Jew according to my lights,” he wrote his father, “my definition differing from yours.”</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
As a youth he chafed at having to observe the rituals and marry a Jewish girl. As an adult, he embraced the lifestyle of a highborn Englishman. On his country estate, he hunted and was a naturalist and ornithologist. “There was something… alien in the very depth of his affection for England,” Bermant remarks. (259)</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A tall nerdy-looking man who wore a monocle, Montagu suffered the gibes of friends and enemies in silence. His “ugliness was obliterated by his charms,” wrote his friend Duff Cooper.” He had a huge ungainly body, a deep soft voice and dark eyes that sparkled with kindliness.” (253)</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
An able debater at Cambridge, Montagu caught the attention of H.H. Asquith, the President of the rival Oxford Union. He followed Asquith into politics and after the Liberal landslide of 1906 became his private secretary. An intelligent and persuasive speaker, Montagu seemed destined for great things.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Asquith became Prime Minister in 1908. He and Montagu were both infatuated with Venetia Stanley a friend of Asquith’s daughter, and 35 years Asquith’s junior. When the Prime Minister’s attentions became too much, Venetia married Montagu, eight years her senior.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Like Montagu’s love for England, his love for Venetia was unrequited. She had many affairs and burned through his fortune. But he ignored this and, on the eve of his premature death at age 45, wrote to her, “I am miserable at going. You have made me very happy and I hope you will be happy always.” (267)</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
ON ZIONISM</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In 1917, Montagu fought the Balfour Declaration in cabinet and circulated a document accusing the government of anti-Semitism for making all British Jews “aliens and foreigners.” He said he would “willingly disenfranchise every Zionist [and was tempted to] proscribe the Zionist organization as illegal and against the national interest.”</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
(“document” http://student.cs.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/articles/ article0005337.html)</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Of course he was right. But despite being a banker’s son, he wasn’t aware of the Masonic/Zionist plan for world government. They dedicated 1.2 million troops to securing Palestine, almost losing the European War as a consequence. They had to replace Asquith and the Army Chief-of-Staff Gen. William Robertson to get it done.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Montagu was one of those rare Jews who tried to understand the reasons for anti- Semitism instead of blaming “irrational hate.”</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
“I have always recognized the unpopularity…of my community. We have obtained a far greater share of this country’s goods and opportunities than we are numerically entitled to. We reach on the whole maturity earlier, and therefore with people of our own age we compete unfairly. Many of us have been exclusive in our friendships and intolerant in our attitude, and I can easily understand that many a non-Jew in England wants to get rid of us.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But just as there is no community of thought and mode of life among Christian Englishmen, so there is not among Jewish Englishmen. More and more we are educated in public schools and at the Universities, and take our part in the politics, in the Army, in the Civil Service, of our country. And I am glad to think that the prejudices against inter-marriage are breaking down. But when the Jew has a national home, surely it follows that the impetus to deprive us of the rights of British citizenship must be enormously increased. Palestine will become the world’s Ghetto.”</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Montagu was probably responsible for inserting the provision in the Balfour Declaration that said: “Nothing shall be done that may prejudice the civil and religious rights of the existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.”</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
FINALLY</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Jews are taught that they are scapegoats but they don’t learn it is the world government cabal that is using them. Using Zionist, Communist, Liberal, Feminist or Neo Con fronts, it dupes many Jews into advancing policies and beliefs that undermine society which is based on race, religion, nation and family. This gives the appearance Jews in general are responsible for the New World Order.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It doesn’t help that many Jews ignorantly deny this conspiracy exists and cry “anti-Semitism” every time a banker is criticized. It doesn’t help that many have been conned into thinking they need Israel. In fact Israelis are being used to secure the Middle East for the Masonic British elite. The new Israeli Supreme Court building, funded and designed by Rothschilds, is replete with Masonic symbolism. (http://www.thegoldenreport.com/asp/jerrysnewsmanager/anmviewer.asp?a=817&z=2)</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Some of the Rothschilds and their Jewish allies are part of this satanic conspiracy. But most Jews put their countries first, and would want no part of world government. Edwin Montagu, a gentle, sincere civilized man, is an example of such a Jew and an inspiration to us all.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Source - <a href="http://zaidpub.com/2012/12/31/british-jewry-tried-to-stop-zionism/">http://zaidpub.com/2012/12/31/british-jewry-tried-to-stop-zionism/</a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Via - <a href="http://wakeupfromyourslumber.com/blog/lindquist/british-jewry-tried-stop-zionism">http://wakeupfromyourslumber.com/blog/lindquist/british-jewry-tried-stop-zionism</a></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2927947298405872373.post-18287807842897058012014-03-04T10:17:00.000+00:002014-03-04T10:17:10.108+00:00How Hitler defied the bankers<div style="text-align: justify;">
[NOTE: This is presented as a historical post, not as a defense of National Socialism) </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
-------------------------- </div>
<h1 0px="" 1.2em="" 1.6em="" arial="" auto="" black="" class="title" color:="" elvetica="" font-family:="" font-size:="" font-style:="" font-variant:="" id="page-title" justify="" letter-spacing:="" line-height:="" margin:="" none="" normal="" padding:="" sans-serif="" text-align:="" text-indent:="" text-transform:="" white-space:="" word-spacing:="">
</h1>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/6720">http://wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/6720</a><br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Many
people take joy in saying Wall Street and Jewish bankers "financed
Hitler." There is plenty of documented evidence that Wall Street and
Jewish bankers did indeed help finance Hitler <i><b>at first,</b></i> partly
because it allowed the bankers to get rich (as I will describe below)
and partly in order to control Stalin. However, when Germany broke free
from the bankers, the bankers declared a world war against Germany.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
When we look at<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><i><b>all<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></b></i>the
facts, the charge that "Jews financed Hitler" becomes irrelevant. Los
Angeles Attorney Ellen Brown discusses this topic in her book <i>Web Of Debt</i>…</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
When
Hitler came to power, Germany was hopelessly broke. The Treaty of
Versailles had imposed crushing reparations on the German people,
demanding that Germans repay every nation’s costs of the war. These
costs totaled three times the value of all the property in Germany.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
Private
currency speculators caused the German mark to plummet, precipitating
one of the worst runaway inflations in modern times. A wheelbarrow full
of 100 billion-mark banknotes could not buy a loaf of bread. The
national treasury was empty. Countless homes and farms were lost to
speculators and to private (Jewish controlled) banks. Germans lived in
hovels. They were starving.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
Nothing
like this had ever happened before - the total destruction of the
national currency, plus the wiping out of people's savings and
businesses. <span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>On top of this came a global depression. Germany
had no choice but to succumb to debt slavery under international
(mainly Jewish) bankers until 1933, when the National Socialists came
to power. At that point the German government thwarted the
international banking cartels by issuing its own money. World Jewry
responded by declaring a global boycott against Germany.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
Hitler
began a national credit program by devising a plan of public works that
included flood control, repair of public buildings and private
residences, and construction of new roads, bridges, canals, and port
facilities. All these were paid for with money that no longer came from
the private international bankers.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
The
projected cost of these various programs was fixed at one billion units
of the national currency. To pay for this, the German government (not
the international bankers) issued bills of exchange, called Labor
Treasury Certificates. In this way the National Socialists put millions
of people to work, and paid them with Treasury Certificates.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
Under
the National Socialists, Germany’s money wasn't backed by gold (which
was owned by the international bankers). It was essentially a receipt
for labor and materials delivered to the government. Hitler said, "For
every mark issued, we required the equivalent of a mark's worth of work
done, or goods produced." The government paid workers in Certificates.
Workers spent those Certificates on other goods and services, thus
creating more jobs for more people. In this way the German people
climbed out of the crushing debt imposed on them by the international
bankers.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
Within
two years, the unemployment problem had been solved, and Germany was
back on its feet. It had a solid, stable currency, with no debt, and no
inflation, at a time when millions of people in the United States and
other Western countries (controlled by international bankers) were
still out of work. <span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>Within five years, Germany went from the poorest nation in Europe to the richest.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
Germany
even managed to restore foreign trade, despite the international
bankers’ denial of foreign credit to Germany, and despite the global
boycott by Jewish-owned industries. Germany succeeded in this by
exchanging equipment and commodities directly with other countries,
using a barter system that cut the bankers out of the picture. Germany
flourished, since barter eliminates national debt and trade deficits.
(Venezuela does the same thing today when it trades oil for
commodities, plus medical help, and so on. Hence the bankers are trying
to squeeze Venezuela.)</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
Germany's
economic freedom was short-lived; but it left several monuments,
including the famous Autobahn, the world's first extensive superhighway.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
Hjalmar Schacht, a Rothschild agent who was temporarily head of the German central bank, summed
it up thus… An American banker had commented, "Dr. Schacht, you should
come to America. We've lots of money and that's real banking." Schacht
replied, "You should come to Berlin. We don't have money. That's real
banking."</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<b>(Schact,
the Rothschild agent, actually supported the private international
bankers against Germany, and was rewarded by having all charges against
him dropped at the Nuremberg trials.)</b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
This economic freedom made Hitler extremely popular with the German people. <span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>Germany
was rescued from English economic theory, which says that all currency
must be borrowed against the gold owned by a private and secretive
banking cartel -- such as the Federal Reserve, or the Central Bank of
Europe -- rather than issued by the government for the benefit of the
people.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
Canadian
researcher Dr. Henry Makow (who is Jewish himself) says the main reason
why the bankers arranged for a world war against Germany was that
Hitler sidestepped the bankers by creating his own money, thereby
freeing the German people. Worse, this freedom and prosperity
threatened to spread to other nations. Hitler had to be stopped!</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
Makow
quotes from the 1938 interrogation of C. G. Rakovsky, one of the
founders of Soviet Bolsevism and a Trotsky intimate. Rakovsky was tried
in show trials in the USSR under Stalin. According to Rakovsky,<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><i><b>Hitler was at first funded by the international bankers, through the bankers’ agent Hjalmar Schacht.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></b></i>The
bankers financed Hitler in order to control Stalin, who had usurped
power from their agent Trotsky. Then Hitler became an even bigger
threat than Stalin when Hitler started printing his own money.<br />
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
(Stalin came to power in 1922, which was eleven years before Hitler came to power.)</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
Rakovsky said:</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="color: #4c1130;">“Hitler
took over the privilege of manufacturing money, and not only physical
moneys, but also financial ones. He took over the machinery of
falsification and put it to work for the benefit of the people. Can you
possibly imagine what would have come if this had infected a number of
other states?”</span> (Henry Makow, "Hitler Did Not Want War,"<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="http://www.savethemales.com/" style="color: #005a8c; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">www.savethemales.com</a><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>March 21, 2004).</div>
</blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
Economist Henry C K Liu writes of Germany's remarkable transformation:</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
“The
Nazis came to power in 1933 when the German economy was in total
collapse, with ruinous war-reparation obligations and zero prospects
for foreign investment or credit. Through an<i><b>independent</b></i><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>monetary
policy of sovereign credit and a full-employment public-works program,
the Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of
overseas colonies, into the strongest economy in Europe within four
years, even before armament spending began.” (Henry C. K. Liu, "Nazism
and the German Economic Miracle," Asia Times (May 24, 2005).</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
In <i>Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People</i><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>(1984), Sheldon Emry commented:</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
“Germany
issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which accounts
for Germany’s startling rise from the depression to a world power in
five years. The German government financed its entire operations from
1935 to 1945 without gold, and without debt. It took the entire
Capitalist and Communist world to destroy the German revolution, and
bring Europe back under the heel of the Bankers.”</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
These facts do not appear in any textbooks today, since Jews own most publishing companies. What<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><i><b>does</b></i><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>appear
is the disastrous runaway inflation suffered in 1923 by the Weimar
Republic, which governed Germany from 1919 to 1933. Today’s textbooks
use this inflation to twist truth into its opposite. They cite the
radical devaluation of the German mark as an example of what goes wrong
when governments print their own money, rather than borrow it from
private cartels. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
In
reality, the Weimar financial crisis began with the impossible
reparations payments imposed at the Treaty of Versailles. Hjalmar
Schacht – the Rothschild agent who was currency commissioner for the
Republic -- opposed letting the German government print its own money…</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
“The Treaty of Versailles is a model of ingenious measures for the economic destruction of Germany. <span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>Germany
could not find any way of holding its head above the water, other than
by the inflationary expedient of printing bank notes.”</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Schact
echoes the textbook lie that Weimar inflation was caused when the
German government printed its own money. However, in his 1967 book<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><i>The Magic of Money,</i><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>Schact let the cat out of the bag by revealing that it was the<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><i><b>PRIVATELY-OWNED</b></i><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>Reichsbank, not the German government, that was pumping new currency into the economy. Thus, the<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><i><b>PRIVATE BANK</b></i><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>caused the Weimar hyper-inflation.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
Like
the U.S. Federal Reserve, the Reichsbank was overseen by appointed
government officials, but was operated for private gain. What drove the
wartime inflation into hyperinflation<b><i> was speculation by foreign
investors</i></b>, who sold the mark short, betting on its decreasing value. In
the manipulative device known as the short sale, speculators borrow
something they don't own, sell it, and then "cover" by buying it back
at the lower price.<br />
<br />
Speculation in the German mark was made possible because the<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><i><b>PRIVATELY OWNED</b></i> Reichsbank
(not yet under Nazi control) made massive amounts of currency available
for borrowing. This currency, like U.S. currency today, was created
with accounting entries on the bank's books. Then the funny-money was
lent at compound interest. When the Reichsbank could not keep up with
the voracious demand for marks, other private banks were allowed to
create marks out of nothing, and to lend them at interest. The result
was runaway debt and inflation.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
Thus,
according to Schacht himself, the German government did not cause the
Weimar hyperinflation. On the contrary, the government (under the
National Socialists) got hyperinflation under control. The National
Socialists put the Reichsbank under strict government regulation, and
took prompt corrective measures to eliminate foreign speculation. One
of those measures was to eliminate easy access to funny-money loans
from private banks. Then Hitler got Germany back on its feet by having
the public government issue Treasury Certificates.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
Schacht
, the Rotchschild agent, disapproved of this government fiat money, and
wound up getting fired as head of the Reichsbank when he refused to
issue it. Nonetheless, he acknowledged in his later memoirs that
allowing the government to issue the money it needed did not produce
the price inflation predicted by classical economic theory, which says
that currency must be borrowed from private cartels.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
What
causes hyper-inflation is uncontrolled speculation. When speculation is
coupled with debt (owed to private banking cartels) the result is
disaster. On the other hand, when a government issues currency in
carefully measured ways, it causes supply and demand to increase
together, leaving prices unaffected. Hence there is no inflation, no
debt, no unemployment, and no need for income taxes.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
Naturally
this terrifies the bankers, since it eliminates their powers. It also
terrifies Jews, since their control of banking allows them to buy the
media, the government, and everything else.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 12pt;">Therefore, to those who delight in saying “Jews financed Hitler,” I ask that they please look at all the facts.</span></div>
Lucashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17529021789568484898noreply@blogger.com0